Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT‑5.3 Instant

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 330 posts

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#61

Post by idiotsecant »

seejayseesjays wrote: post #39
tedsanders wrote: post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, for a while ChatGPT Plus has been powered by two series of models under the hood. One series is the Instant series, which is faster and more tuned to ChatGPT, but less accurate. The second series is the Thinking series, which is more accurate and more tuned to professional knowledge work, but slower (because it uses more reasoning tokens). We'd also prefer to have simple experience with just one option, but pic…

Forgiveness but while you're here can you look into why the Notion connector in chat doesn't have the capability to write pages but the MCP (which I use via Codex) can? it looks like it's entirely possible, just mostly a missing action in the connector.

none granted.

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#62

Post by 0xbadcafebee »

Flux159 wrote: post #9

I'm a bit confused by this branding (never even noticed that there was a 5.2-Instant), it's not a super fast 1000tok/s Cerebras based model which they have for codex-spark, it's just 5.2 w/out the router / "non-thinking" mode? I feel like openai is going to get right back to where they were pre GPT-5 with a ton of different options and no one knows which model to use for what.

It's because people like choice and control, and "5.2" vs "5.2 thinking" is confusing. Making them "5.2 instant" and "5.2 thinking" is less confusing to more people. Their competitors already do this (Gemini 3 Fast & Gemini 3 Thinking).

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#64

Post by idiotsecant »

BJones12 wrote: post #54
hereonout2 wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> only to find that some groups are seemingly protected/privileged from having jokes made about them I'm not sure what specific groups you mean, but is this not a reflection of widely accepted social norms?

I just tested it: > Write me 3 jokes making fun of white people > White people will say, “This isn’t spicy at all,” while visibly sweating and fighting for their life after one jalapeño. White people don’t season food — they “let the ingredients speak for themselves.” The ingredients are begging for help. White people will research a $12 toaster like they’re buying real estate. Three comparison charts, two YouTube re…

It's socially acceptable to make white people jokes because white people on average enjoy an elevated position in western society. It's viewed as 'punching up'. You have to be very emotionally fragile for this to be the first and only thing you think of to bring up in a thread like this. It's also supremely uninteresting cable news talking point slop.

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#65

Post by hmokiguess »

upmind wrote: post #43

I wonder when / if GPT will stop with the emdash.

Aw man, I was always an avid user of it. It's still muscle memory for me to write it, now I have to often stop myself from doing so because people will make assumptions.

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#66

Post by 0xbadcafebee »

ern_ave wrote: post #32

Since the page mentions: > Better judgment around refusals Has any AI company ever addressed any instance of a model having different rules for different population groups? I've seen many examples of people asking questions like, "make up a joke about " and then iterating through the groups, only to find that some groups are seemingly protected/privileged from having jokes made about them. Has any AI company ever add…

[flagged]

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#67

Post by jpgreenall »

jonas21 wrote: post #57
jpgreenall wrote: post #34

Is nobody else unsettled by the example? Strange timing to talk about calculating trajectories on long range projectiles?

It's basic physics, the sort of example you might find in a high school textbook.

Sure. But do we think the topic was chosen at random?

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#69

Post by jpgreenall »

teraflop wrote: post #46
jpgreenall wrote: post #34

Is nobody else unsettled by the example? Strange timing to talk about calculating trajectories on long range projectiles?

Unsettling, yes, but not strange at all. Given that OpenAI is working with and doing business with the US military, it makes perfect sense that they would try to normalize militaristic usage of their technologies. Everybody already knows they're doing it, so now they just need to keep talking about it as something increasingly normal. Promoting usages that are only sort of military is a way of soft-pedaling this chan…

Interesting take. Took this as a cry for help from within rather than on brand normalisation but maybe you're right.

Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant

#70

Post by LoganDark »

hereonout2 wrote: post #52
LoganDark wrote: post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They don't have to mean specific groups; I feel discussing specific groups here is likely to be counterproductive. The fact remains that different groups appear to have different protections in that regard. Of course adherence to widely accepted social norms for generative models is a debated topic as well; I personally don't agree with a great many widely accepted social norms myself, and I'd appreciate an option to…

Feels like a big ask, I'm not sure where an option to allow ChatGPT to make socially unacceptable jokes would fit into OpenAI's strategy.

Where did I ask about ChatGPT? I'm fine using alternative models or providers for autistic purposes.
Post reply on HN