GPT‑5.3 Instant
openai.com
GPT‑5.3 Instant
1–10 of 330 posts
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#2How do I know if I'm using GPT5.3 Instant on ChatGPT?
I don't see it in selections.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#3How do I know if I'm using GPT5.3 Instant on ChatGPT? I don't see it in selections.
Whenever they say "available today" I take it as "hopefully I'll start seeing it in the app UI by tomorrow" rather than "I should get my hopes up it's there now".
When they do push the update to the app UI to me I expect 5.2 Instant will be moved under the legacy models submenu where 5.1 Instant is currently and the selection of Instant in the menu will end up showing as 5.3 Instant on close (and it'll be the default instant at that point).
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#4From one example
> Many people in SF are:
> Highly educated
> Career-focused
> Transplants
> Used to independence
Is "transplants" a San Francisco slang for relocators?
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#5GPT‑5.2 Instant’s tone could sometimes feel “cringe,” coming across as overbearing or making unwarranted assumptions about user intent or emotions.
Strange way to write this. Why use the Gen Z cringe and put it into quotation marks? Wouldn’t it be better to just use the actual word cringeworthy which has the identical meaning?
My guess is that the article was originally written by some Gen Z intern and then some older employee added the quotation marks to the Gen Z slang.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#6GPT-5.2 has been such a terrible regression that I have cancelled my OpenAI account. It's possible I might not have noticed it if Claude wasn't so much better, though.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#7From one example > Many people in SF are: > Highly educated > Career-focused > Transplants > Used to independence Is "transplants" a San Francisco slang for relocators?
It's not specific to SF but more or less yes
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#8From one example > Many people in SF are: > Highly educated > Career-focused > Transplants > Used to independence Is "transplants" a San Francisco slang for relocators?
This has been common parlance in much of the US for a long time. I would hesitate to even call it slang at this point. It's a pretty commonly used term.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#9I'm a bit confused by this branding (never even noticed that there was a 5.2-Instant), it's not a super fast 1000tok/s Cerebras based model which they have for codex-spark, it's just 5.2 w/out the router / "non-thinking" mode?
I feel like openai is going to get right back to where they were pre GPT-5 with a ton of different options and no one knows which model to use for what.
Re: GPT‑5.3 Instant
#10GPT‑5.2 Instant’s tone could sometimes feel “cringe,” coming across as overbearing or making unwarranted assumptions about user intent or emotions. Strange way to write this. Why use the Gen Z cringe and put it into quotation marks? Wouldn’t it be better to just use the actual word cringeworthy which has the identical meaning? My guess is that the article was originally written by some Gen Z intern and then some olde…
What an Ohio take. Not skibidi. Very chopped, unc.