Live data from Hacker News

I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

twitter.com

261–270 of 1001 posts

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#261
No surprise here. All government actions are now in the Trump mafia boss style.

“You won’t let us use your product unrestricted for military applications? Fuck you, we’re going to stop using it for anything at all across the entire federal government, even if not remotely related to military.”

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#263
"Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic."

This is authoritarian behavior. You're having trouble negotiating a contract, so instead of just canceling it - you basically ban all of F500 from doing business with that firm.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#264

The disconnect here for me is, I assume the DoW and Anthropic signed a contract at some point and that contract most likely stipulated that these are the things they can do and these are the things they can't do. I would assume the original terms the DoW is now railing against were in those original contracts that they signed. In that case it looks like the DoW is acting in bad faith here, they signed the original co…

I don't believe they can change the name to Department of War without an actor Congress. It remains the DoD.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#265

Topics like this are where I struggle with HN philosophy. Normally avoiding politics and ideology where possible, created higher quality and more interesting discussions. But how do you even begin to discuss that Tweet or this topic without talking about ideology and to contextualize this with other seemingly unrelated things currently going on in the US? I genuinely don't think I'm conversationally agile enough to b…

>Topics like this are where I struggle with HN philosophy. Normally avoiding politics and ideology where possible, created higher quality and more interesting discussions.

Our whole society runs on technology. All tech is inherently political.

A "no politics" stance is merely an endorsement of the status quo.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If we were able to give the Ukrainians fully automated kill bots, and those kill bots enabled Ukraine to swiftly expel the Russians from their territories, would that not be a good thing? Or would you rather the meat grinder continue to destroy Ukraine's young men to satisfy some moral purity threshold? If we could give Taiwan killbots that would ensure China could never invade, or at least could never occupy Taiwan,…

You seem to see everything from a binary perspective. China bad, Taiwan good. Russia bad, Ukraine good. The world is more nuanced than that. But to answer your question. No we should not give anyone automatic kill bots. Automatic kill bots shouldn’t even be a thing.

Yes, I think Russia's invasion of Ukraine is quite clearly a binary Russia=bad, Ukraine=good. Same for the impending Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Perhaps you could explain the nuances under which Russia was the good guy? Better yet, maybe you could explain it to the Ukrainians who have been displaced, or the family members of those who have been killed, or the soldiers who have been permanently maimed?

Whether you or I like it or not, automatic kill bots will be a thing. It will only be a question of which countries have them and which do not.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EU won't do 996

Not doing 996 is a feature not a bug

Anthropic would disagree seemingly.[1]

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/996-work-culture-silicon-val...

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not doing 996 is a feature not a bug

Not when you want to win and compete with someone who does 996

instead of running guys to the ground, you _could_ hire more people and do shifts if it's that important to stay current.
Post reply on HN