“You won’t let us use your product unrestricted for military applications? Fuck you, we’re going to stop using it for anything at all across the entire federal government, even if not remotely related to military.”
I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
261–270 of 1001 posts
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#262Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#263This is authoritarian behavior. You're having trouble negotiating a contract, so instead of just canceling it - you basically ban all of F500 from doing business with that firm.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#264The disconnect here for me is, I assume the DoW and Anthropic signed a contract at some point and that contract most likely stipulated that these are the things they can do and these are the things they can't do. I would assume the original terms the DoW is now railing against were in those original contracts that they signed. In that case it looks like the DoW is acting in bad faith here, they signed the original co…
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#265Topics like this are where I struggle with HN philosophy. Normally avoiding politics and ideology where possible, created higher quality and more interesting discussions. But how do you even begin to discuss that Tweet or this topic without talking about ideology and to contextualize this with other seemingly unrelated things currently going on in the US? I genuinely don't think I'm conversationally agile enough to b…
Our whole society runs on technology. All tech is inherently political.
A "no politics" stance is merely an endorsement of the status quo.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#266Earlier quoted context omitted.
If we were able to give the Ukrainians fully automated kill bots, and those kill bots enabled Ukraine to swiftly expel the Russians from their territories, would that not be a good thing? Or would you rather the meat grinder continue to destroy Ukraine's young men to satisfy some moral purity threshold? If we could give Taiwan killbots that would ensure China could never invade, or at least could never occupy Taiwan,…
You seem to see everything from a binary perspective. China bad, Taiwan good. Russia bad, Ukraine good. The world is more nuanced than that. But to answer your question. No we should not give anyone automatic kill bots. Automatic kill bots shouldn’t even be a thing.
Whether you or I like it or not, automatic kill bots will be a thing. It will only be a question of which countries have them and which do not.
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#267Earlier quoted context omitted.
EU won't do 996
Not doing 996 is a feature not a bug
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/996-work-culture-silicon-val...
Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#268Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk
#269It is an interesting point. What's the difference between this use license and others?