I'll be interested to hear stories - down the line - from the participants in the the LLM SEO war [1].
Interesting that tailwind won out decisively in their niche, but still has seen the business ravaged by LLMs.
What Claude Code chooses
21–30 of 266 posts
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#22Not sure what to make of this. React is missing entirely. Or is this report also assuming that React is the default for everything and not worth mentioning at all? Just like shadcn/ui's first mention of React is somewhere down the page or hidden in the docs? Furthermore, what's the point of "no tools named"? Why would I restrict myself like that? If I put "use Nodejs, Hono, TypeScript and use Hono's html helper to ge…
As someone who runs a small dev agency, I'm very interested in research like this.
Let's say some Doctor decides to vibecode an app on the weekend, with next to 0 exposure to software development until she started hearing about how easy it was to create software with these tools. She makes incredible progress and is delighted in how well it works, but as she considers actually opening it up the world she keeps running into issues. How do I know this is secure? How do I keep this maintained and running?
I want to be in a position where she can find me to get professional help, so it's very helpful to know what stacks these kinds of apps are being built in.
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#23This is where LLM advertising will inevitably end up: completely invisible. It's the ultimate "influencer". Or not even advertising, just conflict of interest. A canary for this would be whether Gemini skews toward building stuff on GCP.
Advertisers will only pay if AI providers will provide them data on the equivalent of “ad impressions”. And unlabeled/non-evident advertisements are illegal in many (most?) countries.
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#24I just got an incredible idea about how foundation model providers can reach profitability
I'm already seeing a degradation in experience in Gemini's response since they've started stuffing YouTube recommendations at the end of the response. Anthropic is right in not adding these subtle(or not) monetization incentives.
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#25Re: What Claude Code chooses
#26I'll be interested to hear stories - down the line - from the participants in the the LLM SEO war [1]. Interesting that tailwind won out decisively in their niche, but still has seen the business ravaged by LLMs. [1] https://paritybits.me/copilot-seo-war/
It's like tailwindcss was purposely designed to be managed my LLM.
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#27Re: What Claude Code chooses
#28This is where LLM advertising will inevitably end up: completely invisible. It's the ultimate "influencer". Or not even advertising, just conflict of interest. A canary for this would be whether Gemini skews toward building stuff on GCP.
[deleted]
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#29This is where LLM advertising will inevitably end up: completely invisible. It's the ultimate "influencer". Or not even advertising, just conflict of interest. A canary for this would be whether Gemini skews toward building stuff on GCP.
Richard Thaler must be proud. This is the ultimate implementation of "Nudge"
Re: What Claude Code chooses
#30This is where LLM advertising will inevitably end up: completely invisible. It's the ultimate "influencer". Or not even advertising, just conflict of interest. A canary for this would be whether Gemini skews toward building stuff on GCP.
Advertisers will only pay if AI providers will provide them data on the equivalent of “ad impressions”. And unlabeled/non-evident advertisements are illegal in many (most?) countries.
It doesn't necessarily have to be advertisers paying AI providers. It could be advertisers working to ensure they get recommended by the latest models. The next form of SEO.