Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

What Claude Code chooses

amplifying.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 266 posts

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#11

Post by evdubs »

giancarlostoro wrote: post #10

This is funny to me because when I tell Claude how I want something built I specify which libraries and software patents I want it to use, every single time. I think every developer should be capable of guiding the model reasonably well. If I'm not sure, I open a completely different context window and ask away about architecture, pros and cons, ask for relevant links or references, and make a decision.

You specify which software patents you want it to use?

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#12

Post by isubkhankulov »

evdubs wrote: post #11
giancarlostoro wrote: post #10

This is funny to me because when I tell Claude how I want something built I specify which libraries and software patents I want it to use, every single time. I think every developer should be capable of guiding the model reasonably well. If I'm not sure, I open a completely different context window and ask away about architecture, pros and cons, ask for relevant links or references, and make a decision.

You specify which software patents you want it to use?

Patterns?

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#13

Post by glimshe »

rishabhaiover wrote: post #5
woah wrote: post #3

I just got an incredible idea about how foundation model providers can reach profitability

is it anything like the OpenAI ad model but for tool choice haha

Claude Free suggests Visual Studio.

Claude Plus suggests VSCode.

Claude Pro suggests emacs.

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#15

Post by wrs »

This is where LLM advertising will inevitably end up: completely invisible. It's the ultimate "influencer".

Or not even advertising, just conflict of interest. A canary for this would be whether Gemini skews toward building stuff on GCP.

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#18

Post by dmix »

LLMs are going to keep React alive for the indefinite future.

Especially with all the no-code app building tools like Lovable which deal with potential security issues of an LLM running wild on a server, by only allowing it to build client-side React+Vite app using Supabase JWT.

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#19

Post by nineteen999 »

This seems web centric and I expect that colors the decision making during this analysis somewhat.

People are using it for all kinds of other stuff, C/C++, Rust, Golang, embedded. And of course if you push it to use a particular tool/framework you usually won't get much argument from it.

Re: What Claude Code chooses

#20

Post by nineteen999 »

furyofantares wrote: post #4
WA wrote: post #2

Not sure what to make of this. React is missing entirely. Or is this report also assuming that React is the default for everything and not worth mentioning at all? Just like shadcn/ui's first mention of React is somewhere down the page or hidden in the docs? Furthermore, what's the point of "no tools named"? Why would I restrict myself like that? If I put "use Nodejs, Hono, TypeScript and use Hono's html helper to ge…

> Furthermore, what's the point of "no tools named"? There are vibe coders out there that don't know anything about coding.

I mean, i guess that will shortly put an end to the "no code" movement.
Post reply on HN