Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

311–320 of 1001 posts

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#311

Post by tayo42 »

password54321 wrote: post #67
wepple wrote: post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy

Not claiming anything to be false, just a reminder that you should question ones opinion a bit more and not claim they "know what they are talking about" because they worked with Fei-Fei Li. You are outsourcing your thinking to someone else which is lazy and a good way of getting conned. What even happened to https://eurekalabs.ai/ ?

We know that he knows what he is talking about based on all of the educational content he's produced. What's with the low effort posts and comments?

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#312

Post by throawayonthe »

qoez wrote: post #236

I'm predicting some wave of articles why clawd is over and was overhyped all along in a few months and the position of not having delved into it in the first place will have been the superior use of your limited time alive

you're right, i should draft one now

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#313

Post by verdverm »

simonw wrote: post #310
hmokiguess wrote: post #307

Are these things actually useful or do we have an epidemic of loneliness and a deep need for vanity AI happening? I say this because I can’t bring myself to finding a use case for it other than a toy that gets boring fast. One example in some repos around scheduling capabilities mentions “open these things and summarize them for me” this feels like spam and noise not value. A while back we had a trending tweet about…

I don't have a Claw running right now and I wish I did. I want to start archiving the livestream from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfGL7A2YgUY - YouTube only provide access to the last 12 hours. If I had a Claw on a 24/7 machine somewhere I could message it and say "permanent archive this stream" and it would figure it out and do it.

If you know the method already, why is cron insufficient? Why use a meat bag to message over cron? Is that the setup phase for a new stream?

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#314

Post by samiv »

nightski wrote: post #298
deepsquirrelnet wrote: post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The DoDs recent beef with Anthropic over their right to restrict how Claude can be used is revealing. > Though Anthropic has maintained that it does not and will not allow its AI systems to be directly used in lethal autonomous weapons or for domestic surveillance Autonomous AI weapons is one of the things the DoD appears to be pursuing. So bring back the Skynet people, because that’s where we apparently are. 1. http…

If you ever doubted it you were fooling yourself. It is inevitable.

It's ok we'll just send a robot back in time to help destroy the chip that starts it.

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#316

Post by verdverm »

throawayonthe wrote: post #312
qoez wrote: post #236

I'm predicting some wave of articles why clawd is over and was overhyped all along in a few months and the position of not having delved into it in the first place will have been the superior use of your limited time alive

you're right, i should draft one now

Use a clawd, it'll have a GitHub repo and Show HN in minutes to go with it. It's what the cool kids are doing anyhow

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#317

Post by bckr »

sph wrote: post #263
claytonaalves wrote: post #219

I'm impressed with how we moved from "AI is dangerous", "Skynet", "don't give AI internet access or we are doomed", "don't let AI escape" to "Hey AI, here is internet, do whatever you want".

This is exactly why artificial super-intelligences are scary. Not necessarily because of its potential actions, but because humans are stupid, and would readily sell their souls and release it into the wild just for an ounce of greed or popularity. And people who don't see it as an existential problem either don't know how deep human stupidity can run, or are exactly those that would greedily seek a quick profit befo…

Look, we’ve had nukes for almost 100 years now. Do you really think our ancient alien zookeepers are gonna let us wipe with AI? Semi /j

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#318

Post by hmokiguess »

simonw wrote: post #310
hmokiguess wrote: post #307

Are these things actually useful or do we have an epidemic of loneliness and a deep need for vanity AI happening? I say this because I can’t bring myself to finding a use case for it other than a toy that gets boring fast. One example in some repos around scheduling capabilities mentions “open these things and summarize them for me” this feels like spam and noise not value. A while back we had a trending tweet about…

I don't have a Claw running right now and I wish I did. I want to start archiving the livestream from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfGL7A2YgUY - YouTube only provide access to the last 12 hours. If I had a Claw on a 24/7 machine somewhere I could message it and say "permanent archive this stream" and it would figure it out and do it.

Yeah that fits the “do the dishes for me” thing, but do you still think the implementation behind it is the proper and best way to go about it?

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#319

Post by doodaddy »

ggrab wrote: post #53

IMO the security pitchforking on OpenClaw is just so overdone. People without consideration for the implications will inevitably get burned, as we saw with the reddit posts "Agentic Coding tool X wiped my hard drive and apologized profusely". I work at a FAANG and every time you try something innovative the "policy people" will climb out of their holes and put random roadblocks in your way, not for the sake of actual…

These comments kill me. It sounds a lot like the “job creators” argument. If only these pesky regulations would go away I could create jobs and everyone would be rich. It’s a bogus argument either way.

Now for the more reasonable point: instead of being adversarial and disparaging those trying to do their job why not realize that, just like you, they have a certain viewpoint and are trying to do the best they can. There is no simple answer to the issues we’re dealing with and it will require compromise. That won’t happen if you see policy and security folks as “climbing out of their holes”.

Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents

#320

Post by RyJones »

moron4hire wrote: post #191
mikkupikku wrote: post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they don't respond to their emails until months after they were nominally brought into the loop. They sit back jerking their dicks all day, voicing no complaints and giving no feedback until the thing is actually done. Yes, management was ultimately at fault. They're at fault for not tard wrangling the security guys into doing their jobs up front. They're also at fault for not tard wrangling the security guys…

Yeah, I've had them complain to the President of the company that I didn't involve them sooner, with the pres having been in the room when I made the first request 12 months ago, the second 9 months ago, the third 6 months ago, etc. They insist we can't let client data [0] "into the cloud" despite the fact that the client's data is already in "the cloud" and all I want to do is stick it back into the same "cloud", ju…

Reminds me of Qualcomm
Post reply on HN