Live data from Hacker News

Privilege is bad grammar

tadaima.bearblog.dev

151–160 of 292 posts

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#151
post #134
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can prompt an LLM to add typos, though

interestingly, you can’t do the same thing with queries like “no em dashes”. it’ll agree, then proceed to use them regardless. could be related to how so-called negative prompts fail to work when asking, say, ChatGPT to generate an image without a crocodile

My theory is that sprinkling emdashes into the output is some intentional measure to "watermark" LLM output.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you literally cannot discern anything of value from a one-time viewing of them. You're conflating actual value with perceived value. It's well established that perceptions matter and people make decisions based on this all the time. > The whole Julia Roberts trope resonates exactly because it happens in real life. No, it resonates because it's a feel good story. I'm sure it happens, but most of the time signaling i…

I remember wandering into Cartier's in NYC dressed in my shaggy jeans and t-shirt. They didn't throw me out, but a security guard followed me around, definitely edging into my personal space to make me uncomfortable. I laughed, said I get it, looked a bit more, and left. I remember the days when you were expected to wear a suit on a jet, even the kids. These days, even the first class travelers wear track shorts. I k…

> I kinda wish the airlines would have a dress code

I'd take a code of conduct before the dress code. Though, appropriately enough, I suppose the latter signals the former

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#154

Bad grammar is disrespect. Underlings have to swallow that disrespect. It is just a power game. The next level is simply to insult everyone, and everyone will still remain submissive.

And if you insult people, and get rewarded by submission, one reaction is to amp up the insults.

After all, you don't know the limits of your power until someone quits. So abuse people, exhibit outlandish public behavior, say racist or otherwise objectionable things...every person who remains on your payroll is a sign of how powerful you are.

This is not a common tactic, but it's a highly visible tactic, and it's not hard to find some notable examples out there right now.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#155
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Still signalling. People don't get to decide if they're signalling or not. They only get to decide if they'll consciously signal or subconsciously signal. They (or their clothes as per the example) sends signals in either case.

I feel like this is actually that people don't get to decide if others will perceive signals.

This is a distinction without a difference; a signal was received, whether you meant to send it or not.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#157

This is almost textbook countersignalling. The same as: - Signalling: I dress more formally than everyone else to make up for the fact I'm less professional in other ways - No signalling: I dress like everyone else because I am like everyone else - Countersignalling: I wear ratty old clothes with holes in them, and nobody will dare to question it because I'm the important one here

There's also: - No signalling: I dress more formally than everyone else because that's been my style since forever and I'm not going to change for a role that doesn't require it.

I find this kind of funny, since you say your not signalling anything, and then in the second half of the sentence describe for us a very signal you claim you aren't sending:

> I'm not going to change for a role that doesn't require it.

Whether you like it or not, whether you meant to or not, you are communicating something here. You don't get to opt out.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#158

I latch on to some of these trends by lowercasing everything, in this case I mostly just don’t correct it if I missed a case its more like insulation, the people that criticize it seem less connected and less compensated than me while understanding exactly what was conveyed, and the people like me are the same like “look at this try hard middle manager that doesn’t focus on anything relevant” one thing I do conscious…

people are scared of periods? ... lmao!

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#159
post #9

This is almost textbook countersignalling. The same as: - Signalling: I dress more formally than everyone else to make up for the fact I'm less professional in other ways - No signalling: I dress like everyone else because I am like everyone else - Countersignalling: I wear ratty old clothes with holes in them, and nobody will dare to question it because I'm the important one here

On the positive side of this, research papers by competent people read very clearly with readable sentences, while those who are afraid that their content doesn't quite cut it, litter it with jargon, long complicated sentences, hoping that by making things hard, they will look smart. But to expand on the spelling topic, good spelling and grammar is now free with AI tools. It no longer signals being educated. Informal…

> It no longer signals being educated. Informal tone and mistakes actually signal that the message was written by a human and the imperfections increase my trust in the effort spent on the thing.

But... you know that this moment will be so fleeting as one can trivially generate mistakes to look human.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#160
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What else should you call something that is only socially acceptable for a certain group of people to do? I understand word fatigue, but it feels very adequately used here.

[flagged]

You aren't being nearly as clever here as you think you are.
Post reply on HN