Live data from Hacker News

Privilege is bad grammar

tadaima.bearblog.dev

91–100 of 292 posts

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s why there are entire books based on the joke that you can’t tell a homeless guy from a hippie with a trust fund.

And of course you can, at latest after one or two sentences.

100%. The homeless guy will sound way more coherent and less sociopathic.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#92

It’s because the higher you are in the chain of corporate command, the less time you have to dedicate to each task. You end up with shorter answers to every note because you wouldn’t have time to reply to all notes and do the strategic things you need to do, otherwise. As an individual contributor on a team, you may have to interface at most with 30 people on a weekly basis. As a second line leader you may have 150 p…

Shorter answers don't necessitate terrible grammar. Maybe it's because my mom was a teacher and I had good grammar drilled into me, but I feel like it shows respect for the people you're communicating with.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#96
post #20
post #3

At one of my previous jobs some of my coworkers and I had an in-joke about how it was possible to tell which of the emails from the CEO were written directly by him or not based on whether it used the spelling "pls" for "please" because of how often he liked to use it. It hadn't occurred to me to view this phenomenon in the way that the article does, but at least in my experience it certainly seems to be accurate.

A CEO saying “please”, regardless of how it’s spelt, is itself an anomaly ;)

He’s saying half the word, at least… pretty good for a CEO.

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#98
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the positive side of this, research papers by competent people read very clearly with readable sentences, while those who are afraid that their content doesn't quite cut it, litter it with jargon, long complicated sentences, hoping that by making things hard, they will look smart. But to expand on the spelling topic, good spelling and grammar is now free with AI tools. It no longer signals being educated. Informal…

>Informal tone and mistakes actually signal that the message was written by a human and the imperfections increase my trust in the effort spent on the thing. Isn’t this a bit short sighted? So if someone has a wide vocabulary and uses proper grammar, you mistrust them by default?

> Isn’t this a bit short sighted? So if someone has a wide vocabulary and uses proper grammar, you mistrust them by default?

I don't trust anyone who doesn't use swear words, does that count?

Re: Privilege is bad grammar

#100

It’s because the higher you are in the chain of corporate command, the less time you have to dedicate to each task. You end up with shorter answers to every note because you wouldn’t have time to reply to all notes and do the strategic things you need to do, otherwise. As an individual contributor on a team, you may have to interface at most with 30 people on a weekly basis. As a second line leader you may have 150 p…

That doesn't explain the "punctuating with multiple cryface emojis".
Post reply on HN