Why shouldnt they be allowed to make a cap at 10M?
Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
21–30 of 174 posts
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#22Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Swiss comp advantage started in WWII when they were used to exchange Nazis gold into other currencies - this gave them a topstart for the economic period after the war since they were perfectly connected globally and they understood to scale & keep this advantage for long time. Maybe its fading a little bit nowadays
To be honest during WWII, Switzerland was surrounded by the Nazis. Literally. On all sides, and learned a harsh lesson on not just the importance of military readiness but also economic resilience. So they took what they could get.
Plus: they are the only(!) country on earth who could offer bunker protection to 95%+ of society in case of war.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
im not sure about Switzerland, but there are areas in Germany, where you can.
I doubt that very much. Sure there's places where the rent is less, but there's no jobs there. So a very low rent will still be over 40% of your pay (ie. nothing)
I am looking at a 4 room apartment in a very nice villa next to a small national park right now, for 560€, with a train going twice an hour 15 minutes ride to the town with my potential next job. (In germany)
So salaries there are lower, but so is apparently rent. Way less than 40%, more like 20%.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#25Why shouldnt they be allowed to make a cap at 10M?
But, it does seem like a terrible place to live. I fear for the immigrants who form the basis of the economy.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#26"Anti foreigner sentiment"? Dear NYT, try to find an apartment in the EU or Switzerland. At best, you will get a furnished (to circumvent rent caps), overpriced 30 square meter dump that takes up 40% of your net salary. Once that problem is solved, we can talk about "sentiments".
Maybe work on changing zoning laws instead of pandering to farmers and rural cantons?
Of course, nobody can agree on where the line is, or escape the shoulder-rubbing with racism and classism while trying to argue where the line is.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#27This vote, however, does not stem from the federal (or even state-level) government, but instead is an initiative launched by a group of conservative politicians which happen to be part of the SVP party. The Swiss Federal Council (executive body) has come out against this initiative.
Switzerland has a form of direct democracy, where any group of individuals can propose a change in laws and if they collect 100k signatures (within 18 months) this proposed text will be voted on by the whole country. Here is a list of all referendums, a subset of which are these initiatives: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Swiss_federal_referend...
These initiatives are a frequent feature in Swiss politics, and not necessarily indicative of broadly popular legislation. In fact, whether or not an initiative is accepted is heavily correlated with the support it receives form the federal government. Give that they oppose it, I would bet against this passing.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#28Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#29There might be a population limit that a country wants to set, based on effects of population visible in employment, housing , transportation, and social services.
There might be a motivation to curb immigration from certain parts of the world, based on cultural factors and aligning more with one side of the political spectrum than the other.
Re: Switzerland to vote on capping population at 10M
#30"Anti foreigner sentiment"? Dear NYT, try to find an apartment in the EU or Switzerland. At best, you will get a furnished (to circumvent rent caps), overpriced 30 square meter dump that takes up 40% of your net salary. Once that problem is solved, we can talk about "sentiments".
Maybe work on changing zoning laws instead of pandering to farmers and rural cantons?
Has changing zoning laws historically ever boosted housing construction by more than 10%?