Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

alexxcons.github.io

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 339 posts

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#11

Post by coldpie »

jchw wrote: post #3

I hope that XFCE remains a solid lightweight desktop option. I've become a huge fan of KDE over the past couple of years, but it certainly isn't what you would consider lightweight or minimal. Personally, I'm a big proponent of Wayland and not big Rust detractor, so I don't see any problem with this. I do, however, wonder how many long-time XFCE fans and the folks who donated the money funding this will feel about it…

> Still I perceive a lot of XFCE's userbase to be more "traditional" and conservative about technologies, and likely to be skeptical of both Wayland and Rust, seeing them as complex, bloated, and unnecessary.

Very long time (since 2007) XFCE user here. I don't think this is accurate. We want things to "just work" and not change for no good reason. Literally no user cares what language a project is implemented in, unless they are bored and enjoy arguing about random junk on some web forum. Wayland has the momentum behind it, and while there will be some justified grumbling because change is always annoying, the transition will happen and will be fairly painless as native support for it continues to grow. The X11 diehards will go the way of the SysV-init diehards; some weird minority that likes to scream about the good old days on web forums but really no one cares about.

There are good reasons to switch to Wayland, and I trust the XFCE team to handle the transition well. Great news from the XFCE team here, I'm excited for them to pull this off.

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#12

Post by mghackerlady »

throw0101a wrote: post #9

Does Wayland work on non-Linux systems (e.g. *BSD)? If an application is written for Wayland, is there a way to send its windows to (e.g.) my Mac, like I can with X11 to XQuartz?

Wayland works pretty well on FreeBSD and I know at least wlroots compositors work a bit on OpenBSD (though, I suspect anyone on OpenBSD would prefer to use their homegrown Xenocara). There are Wayland compositors for Mac, the youtuber Brodie Robertson did a good overview of them a few days ago

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#17

Post by andreldm »

tasn wrote: post #4

Very interesting that they opted for a rewrite in Rust instead of adjusting the existing codebase. I wonder how long it'll take them writing a compositor from scratch.

Not the whole codebase, only the window manager (compositor is the Wayland equivalent). Other components are written in C and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Those components gained Wayland support in the last couple of years, you can try Xfce in a labwc session, there are of course several things to improve, but the compositor is the last big piece missing.

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#18

Post by hagbard_c »

fragmede wrote: post #7

i'm trying to build a Linux desktop and the first thing I got stuck at is X11 versus Wayland for greetd. Next thing Il got stuck at his XFCE4 doesn't exist for Wayland. What the shit. if we want to tell me wayland is the future, fine. sure. great. Tt's been 11 years!

If you're just trying to run Linux you're better off either using one of the many read-made distributions or going with X11 since that works just about everywhere and has done so for decades.

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#19

Post by pantalaimon »

prima-facie wrote: post #15

Am I the only one who's not buying into the Wayland hype? I just want X11 support not to fall into disrepair, as I see nothing wrong with it.

> I just want X11 support not to fall into disrepair

Are you also willing to maintain it?

Re: Xfwl4 – The Roadmap for a Xfce Wayland Compositor

#20

Post by ok123456 »

jchw wrote: post #3

I hope that XFCE remains a solid lightweight desktop option. I've become a huge fan of KDE over the past couple of years, but it certainly isn't what you would consider lightweight or minimal. Personally, I'm a big proponent of Wayland and not big Rust detractor, so I don't see any problem with this. I do, however, wonder how many long-time XFCE fans and the folks who donated the money funding this will feel about it…

Why does Wayland "feel like the future?" It feels like a regression to me and a lot of other people who have run into serious usability problems.

At best, it seems like a huge diversion of time and resources, given that we already had a working GUI. (Maybe that was the intention.) The arguments for it have boiled down to "yuck code older than me" from supposed professionals employed by commercial Linux vendors to support the system, and it doesn't have Android-like separation — a feature no one really wants.

The mantra of "it's a protocol" isn't very comforting when it lacks so many features that necessitate workarounds, leading to fragmentation and general incompatibility. There are plenty of complicated, bad protocols. The ones that survive are inherently "simple" (e.g., SMTP) or "trivial" (e.g., TFTP). Maybe there will be a successor to Wayland that will be the SMTP to its X400, but to me, Wayland seems like a past compromise (almost 16 years of development) rather than a future.

Post reply on HN