hm, I think we should re-evaluate sanctioning or civilian pressure campaigns, since the guise is for them to coax or turn on the government for regime change, but the government can just hire mercenaries from outside the country. don't know a solution but this one isn't it
How about plain civil disobedience? Like just stop working? It would need to get pretty extreme before the government had the audacity (and even capacity) to actually track you down to your home and arrest (or kill) you. Although this kind of coordination might be difficult with government control of communication media.
Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
241–250 of 844 posts
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#242That number would inevitably lead to tons of videos with piles of corpses and cities covered with dead. Like ones that appear when west-backed Julani killed Alawites. But there is almost no such content - only rumors, unnamed sources and documents no one bother to check.
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#243Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#244How is this possible without explosives? Even with vehicle mounted machine guns it seems like a crazy high number. Did the protestors get boxed in somehow? And across so many locations, that seems to require a crazy amount of coordination to kill so many in so little time.
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#245Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#246This is partially on America. Didnt Trump publicly encourage the protesters and promised that the help is on the way?
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
The “Iranians that you work with” in the west are highly self-selecting. They’re like Cubans in Florida or Vietnamese—people who fled in the aftermath of the revolution and are extremely antagonistic towards the regime. My family left Bangladesh the year after the dictator made Islam the official religion. My dad is apoplectic about the Islamist parties being unbanned recently after the government was overthrown. By…
> people who fled in the aftermath of the revolution and are extremely antagonistic towards the regime Iranian who left Iran here. Do you have stats or reference for this critical piece of information? It’s as if someone’s says, since Bangladesh is predominantly muslim, the majority aligns with what the Islamic regime does for ideological reasons and would try to undermine the account of atrocities. But one shouldn’t…
Also, as a Russian who left Russia, it's certainly a familiar pattern.
Note, by the way, that this doesn't really imply anything about whether those people are wrong to be antagonistic.
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is a source run by expatriate Iranians of the diaspora.. the fact that so many people just discount their point of view it's pretty frustrating. If you speak to Iranians that you work with it's pretty illuminating
The “Iranians that you work with” in the west are highly self-selecting. They’re like Cubans in Florida or Vietnamese—people who fled in the aftermath of the revolution and are extremely antagonistic towards the regime. My family left Bangladesh the year after the dictator made Islam the official religion. My dad is apoplectic about the Islamist parties being unbanned recently after the government was overthrown. By…
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#249That's crazy. That's like ~40% of the deaths in the current gaza war, except over just 2 days instead of 2 years.
There was a lot of death in 2 days but the revolution started about a month ago so it's not just those two days. I think you could compare Gaza to a single Iranian city, but Iran is much larger than this. Another important distinction is that - no matter what your beliefs are - civilians aren't the target in Gaza, but they clearly are the target in Iran. If the civilians had weapons, it would be a different story.
"We killed about 80,000 people by mistake" isn't the exculpation you think it is.
Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal
#250Just leaving this here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat
Fun fact, the clergy was a crucial part of the coup, backed by CIA. The same people in power now, btw.
plotted and went about to oust one of the most democratically legitimate leaders of his country by night.
Let that sink in for a moment.