Live data from Hacker News

Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

iranintl.com

201–210 of 844 posts

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#201
post #29

That's crazy. That's like ~40% of the deaths in the current gaza war, except over just 2 days instead of 2 years.

I can’t even imagine how this could be done. Nazi concentration camps would have had trouble killing that many in 2 days.

[flagged]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#203
post #29

That's crazy. That's like ~40% of the deaths in the current gaza war, except over just 2 days instead of 2 years.

[flagged]

Do you believe that there’s a single person (or small group) who chooses what’s on the front page?

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#204
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With respects to Mordechai Vanunu, I can understand why he didn't try leaking documents.

If Ravid isn't even willing to say that someone told him on background, it sounds like bullshit or speculation. Guys like Ravid are intentionally or no part of the myth making around Mossad where they are simultaneously everywhere int he Middle East and nowhere at once.

[flagged]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#205
post #71

[flagged]

This is a little different, this is probably an issue anyone of any side politically can agree is bad. A government is killing their own people in the tens of thousands. It is foolish to even waste time pointing fingers outside of the country in question in my eyes because its irrelevant, their current government is killing citizens in the right here and right now.

[dead]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#206
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.en-hrana.org/day-twenty-eight-of-the-protests-ar... This is the organisation most commonly cited in news reports, they estimate ~5200 protestors confirmed killed (+ a few hundred more for security personnel killed) They are a group of anti-regime Iranian dissidents based in the US. I don't know why they would seek to provide a deliberately low estimate.

Confirmed != estimated. This source does not make any estimates. They are investigating every death individually. Given the lack of transparency, the true number of deaths is likely higher than the number which can be confirmed at this time. As of writing this comment, the subtitle says "The number of deaths currently under investigation stands at 17,031." They do not claim that this is the total number of deaths eit…

[dead]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#207
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

We should be angry about both situations but most people truly don't give a fuck about the latter. It is not just the Iran situation though. We make decisions all the time that result in immense amount of unnecessary suffering because of a total lack of rationality. Our food consumption choices alone have created the objectively largest and most horrific engine of suffering in the history of this planet, all for the…

[dead]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#209

This is depressing because we will go to war over this and it’s going to be five years before people realizing they were tricked by “babies in incubators” propaganda.

No. Shut up. This has been confirmed by countless Iranians

[dead]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#210
post #71

[flagged]

This is a little different, this is probably an issue anyone of any side politically can agree is bad. A government is killing their own people in the tens of thousands. It is foolish to even waste time pointing fingers outside of the country in question in my eyes because its irrelevant, their current government is killing citizens in the right here and right now.

HN mods removed US News of a government killing its own people in Minnesota. The only difference is the quantity. You're being hypocritical.
Post reply on HN