Live data from Hacker News

Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

iranintl.com

111–120 of 844 posts

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#112
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Interesting that the same western media outlets which spent two years nonstop questioning and disputing and refusing to accept Palestinian death tolls out of Gaza, even when they were backed by human rights groups and monitors like Airwars and studies in The Lancet, are totally fine uncritically accepting totally unsourced and huge, huge numbers out of Iran. Note that this works both ways: "Interesting that the sam…

The crucial difference is that the US is in no way supporting Iran but was and is heavily supporting Israel. So a protest in the US to stop that support is wortwhile. A protest to stop non-existent support is pointless.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#114
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It is a source run by expatriate Iranians of the diaspora Including the Mossad, which is kinda an important footnote you might not want to omit: https://xcancel.com/BarakRavid/status/1560685368780939265/

According to a twitter comment by a reporter who didn’t back the claim with any evidence.

With respects to Mordechai Vanunu, I can understand why he didn't try leaking documents.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#115
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just as interesting that Mehdi who never spent a second questioning the reports from Gaza is questioning the reports from Iran.

His point is that those Gaza numbers had much more backing than these numbers. Yet they were questioned endlessly.

His point is obviously to try and downplay what is happening in Iran, otherwise he could have just actually be a journalist and figure out what is happening in Iran to prove or disprove the reports.

There is zero journalistic integrity to be found in his post.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#117
post #71

[flagged]

This is a little different, this is probably an issue anyone of any side politically can agree is bad. A government is killing their own people in the tens of thousands. It is foolish to even waste time pointing fingers outside of the country in question in my eyes because its irrelevant, their current government is killing citizens in the right here and right now.

[flagged]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#118
post #54

The source (Iran International) is backed by Saudi money and has a bias to dunk on Iran. That said, I'm sure the death count numbers from the Rasht Massacre are staggeringly higher than the initial tallies of 2-5k.

It is a source run by expatriate Iranians of the diaspora.. the fact that so many people just discount their point of view it's pretty frustrating. If you speak to Iranians that you work with it's pretty illuminating

It’s similar to how so many people dismiss Cuban American views on Cuba just because the cuban americans were mostly the ownership class that had to flee the revolution.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#120
post #21

This is certainly the end of peaceful Iranian protests. Whether it leads to a violent revolution or a static police state like North Korea remains to be seen.

> Whether it leads to a violent revolution or a static police state like North Korea remains to be seen.

The official name of Iran is "The Islamic Republic of Iran" and it is a country ruled by sharia law. Countries ruled by Sharia are already totalitarian states.

Post reply on HN