Live data from Hacker News

From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

kentik.com

91–100 of 154 posts

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#91

As an Iranian in Iran who is now connected, I have a request: Please tell google make colab available behind the safe browsing IP. Google's safe browsing IP is usually the #1 whitelisted IP in internet blackouts. Having colab on this IP allows tech people to ssh into their servers, and bootstrap connections based on the available protocols at the time.

If this happened, they would blacklist it.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#92
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not going to defend the islamic republic with its massacres, but if there is no racial element there is no apartheid, no need to overload a precise term. This is simply turning down methods of communications to reduce protestors ability to coordinate and enable mass killings

Couldn't they just not kill people in mass?

For some reason this is never seen as a viable solution

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#93
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Japan was leveled to the ground by 1945. What’s the excuse for not having the same GDP per capita 80 years later? The curve became exponential way too late. And only after they (partially) opened up.

They went from 100% communism to 90% capitalism, then had exponential growth, and we are supposed to believe the growth was because of the residual 10% communism.

When comparing a growth rate between 90/10 and 100/0 the difference is apparently explained by the 10

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#94
post #19
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree with you on pretty much everything you have said. The background of policymakers in Europe really annoys me. Just to be clear, I wasn't glazing Iran or anything.

The background of most everyone in Brussels seems so wrong for the technological realities nowadays. I believe this sentiment is shared by a lot of people, and now it unfolds in Europe plainly lacking behind in technology. Which is such a shame given history of discoveries and advancement that was going on on the continent for centuries.

I mean most countries send their failures there, also people who are not liked in the respective countries usually slip there for comfy jobs.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#95
post #30
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The background of most everyone in Brussels seems so wrong for the technological realities nowadays. I believe this sentiment is shared by a lot of people, and now it unfolds in Europe plainly lacking behind in technology. Which is such a shame given history of discoveries and advancement that was going on on the continent for centuries.

The whole European political elite and ruling class feels like a quasi-aristocracy (something the US is slowly moving into as well, with political dynasties and such) that is used to go to some big-name art/humanities place and then slide into the bureaucracy ladder. Totally detached people, and it's a pity because we really need Europe to be better.

The failures fall upwards into Brussels usually, sadly then you get very much second rate politicians that were even hated in their own countries.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#96
post #47
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not going to defend the islamic republic with its massacres, but if there is no racial element there is no apartheid, no need to overload a precise term. This is simply turning down methods of communications to reduce protestors ability to coordinate and enable mass killings

I understand what you are saying and I was thinking about it when I wrote my comment. I still stand by the term. Apartheid literally means "apartness". Even though the segregation in this case is not on a racial basis they still classify their population into two major blocks. Some have full rights, others have none.

[deleted]

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the issue for any US/western regime change operation in Iran (whatever one may think of its moral merits or lack thereof). Iran is not Syria, there's a lot of wily people in the leadership and they won't be rolled over so easily

Yeah, wonder why Trump doesn't threaten North Korea? Because they actually have achieved all this, internal internet completely sealed, nuclear weapons and developing ballistic missiles to reach the USA. So actually.. getting the nukes was the right play for them because eventually they would get sold out by China or Russia. Having nukes gets you to shake hands and send love letters to Trump. Frankly Trump sees Europ…

Everyone seems to have forgotten the independent French nuclear deterrent.

I should probably put an outside bet on the next country to get the Bomb being Poland, maybe by 2050. They've only just started building a civilian reactor, but weapons would make strategic sense for them.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They went from 100% communism to 90% capitalism, then had exponential growth, and we are supposed to believe the growth was because of the residual 10% communism.

When comparing a growth rate between 90/10 and 100/0 the difference is apparently explained by the 10

It’s 100/0 and 10/90.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#99
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, wonder why Trump doesn't threaten North Korea? Because they actually have achieved all this, internal internet completely sealed, nuclear weapons and developing ballistic missiles to reach the USA. So actually.. getting the nukes was the right play for them because eventually they would get sold out by China or Russia. Having nukes gets you to shake hands and send love letters to Trump. Frankly Trump sees Europ…

Everyone seems to have forgotten the independent French nuclear deterrent. I should probably put an outside bet on the next country to get the Bomb being Poland, maybe by 2050. They've only just started building a civilian reactor, but weapons would make strategic sense for them.

I remember back when Poland was joining NATO, they basically said that we want in NATO or we will build our own nuke.

Not sure if Trump understands that he is playing quite a dangerous game in terms of nuclear proliferation because if the US deterrent goes away, the small countries will start thinking about it.

Re: From stealth blackout to whitelisting: Inside the Iranian shutdown

#100
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When comparing a growth rate between 90/10 and 100/0 the difference is apparently explained by the 10

It’s 100/0 and 10/90.

America is 100/0 and China is 90/10. One of them is doing much better, and the difference is apparently explained by the 10.
Post reply on HN