Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

ioplus.nl

21–30 of 82 posts

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#22
They tried a variant of this in Australia for a short period of time before realising IP blocking accidentally takes down thousands of legitimate businesses on shared hosting.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-17/concern-over-asic-int...

They didn’t repeal the law but instead worked out better ways of using the existing powers after a review.

https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/austra...

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#24
> The law requires internet service providers to block reported piracy sites within 30 minutes. AGCOM insists that Cloudflare comply with these demands through its public DNS service, 1.1.1.1. When Cloudflare allegedly failed to do so, the regulator imposed a fine of over €14 million.

€14 million? What the hell is this desperate witch hunt on piracy lately?

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Nah, sports broadcasters and organizations shouldn't get special veto privileges on the internet.

How would you solve banning of pirated live streams of matches? Do you believe every event should be accessible for free to anyone?

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#26
> At the heart of the conflict is Italy’s ‘Piracy Shield,’ a system designed to combat illegal live streams of sports events, such as Serie A football matches. The law requires internet service providers to block reported piracy sites within 30 minutes. AGCOM insists that Cloudflare comply with these demands through its public DNS service, 1.1.1.1. When Cloudflare allegedly failed to do so, the regulator imposed a fine of over €14 million.

Doesn't EU have some kind of net neutrality act? Italy gov can ask DNS resolver to just block pirate sites?

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#27

They really should do this, this is the right and honorable thing to do instead of interfering with local governments and deriding of government organizations by their CEO. I don't even agree with what the Italian government did, but more companies need to do this instead of lobbying for or against laws. No one elected you. The loud voice and influence you wield because of success as a commercial entity does not enti…

> That person is supposed to be other citizens as individuals

It’s been known since the ancient Greeks democracy results in oligarchy. It’s why the US was setup as a republic.

Exercise to the reader why everyone thinks democracy is an unassailable good in the world.

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#28

> The law requires internet service providers to block reported piracy sites within 30 minutes. AGCOM insists that Cloudflare comply with these demands through its public DNS service, 1.1.1.1. When Cloudflare allegedly failed to do so, the regulator imposed a fine of over €14 million. €14 million? What the hell is this desperate witch hunt on piracy lately?

> €14 million? What the hell is this desperate witch hunt on piracy lately?

Because piracy is winning.

Its the only way to build a video streaming system that has everything. And its a better user experience for everyone...

Well, other than rights holders.

Re: Cloudflare threatens Italy exit over €14M fine

#30
post #18

A wolf in sheep's clothing. Cloudflare care about the "open internet" exactly as far as they can profit from it. Why does the "open internet" not allow this polity the right to block itself from that which it deems as harmful?

Did you read the details of the article? The regulator fined them for not hacking DNS to the whims of the media companies in Italy that want to clamp down on piracy by altering the way DNS works. DNS. The actual "open internet" I think you may have this backwards. To me it seems like something they should talk to local Italian ISPs about, not Cloudflare.

But cloudflare do block things. They tend to block things as a rule the American government wants blocking.

The problem is they want to be the people who choose what gets blocked, rather than elected governments.

To me, this whole thing is crazy, certainly pull out if you like, but I'm shocked how many people seem to be siding with the profit-making company over an elected government.

Post reply on HN