Live data from Hacker News

Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

reuters.com

681–690 of 1001 posts

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#681
arabs and iran you should now team up and do something about your collective security, because US is now openly started kidnaping the future of countries. team up with pakistan and ensure it's economic stability and make some NATO like agreement and get atleas 10 Nukes each otherwise you will also see the same day as maduro. i beleave you have very little time.

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#682

As a European: His voters thought Trump would be different, he would bring the troops home, put the homeland first, and that he would fight the Deep State. In reality, he's building out Imperium Americanum, he is fighting wars without Congressional approval and proper casus bellis, he's not bringing the troops home and it is clear he represents the fucking Deep State even more than any of his predecessors since JFK.…

> His voters thought Trump would be different, he would bring the troops home, put the homeland first, and that he would fight the Deep State.

A journalist asked him in the press conference just now how capturing Maduro and running the country in iterim is "America First". His simple answer is that a more stable set of countries in the region is good for America.

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#683

Two wrongs don’t make a right. Regardless of your opinion on Maduro, you can still acknowledge that the head of a sovereign state being captured in an unannounced/unnamed military operation by a superpower is wrong from a principled standpoint, and that it’s destabilising a country with 30+ million people if not the entire region.

Would you have said the same thing in the 40s if the US were able to capture Hitler?

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#684
post #600

A lot of Venezuelans are happy about it. Maduro is not good for Venezuela. The US should not be the decider of who stays in power on another country. The president should not have the power to apprehend a countries president IN THEIR COUNTRY without a process thats more than just "I really want it". The US is giving another clear message that it does not care about global order, just global control. We're back in the…

> if maduro played by the US rules, he would be in power regardless of crimes

This is the key. Trump loves dictators, no matter how they got into power. As long as they give him what he wants or he's afraid of them.

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#685

It's funny how many people already see this as a book that is opened and closed on the same day. That's not how these things work. This is like the first stone of an avalanche. It could stop here, or it could roll on for quite a while. It will take months or even years to know whether or not the outcome here was desirable or not and what the final tally is. Remember the 'Arab spring' and what came after.

[deleted]

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#686

It's funny how many people already see this as a book that is opened and closed on the same day. That's not how these things work. This is like the first stone of an avalanche. It could stop here, or it could roll on for quite a while. It will take months or even years to know whether or not the outcome here was desirable or not and what the final tally is. Remember the 'Arab spring' and what came after.

> It will take months or even years to know whether or not the outcome here was desirable or not and what the final tally is.

So you'd prefer.. inaction? So we know for a fact we will going to reach world peace ten years from now having done absolutely nothing?

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#688
Responsibility for the aftermath is with the US. They previously didn't do a good job in Afghanistan or Iraq after they assumed defacto control, without really trying to make the countries stand on their own. Life is not much better for the average person there.

Venezuela has lots of oil and drugs. If different factions fight between themselves there's no reason you couldn't end up with a divided and dangerous country that in some ways could be worse for the people than Maduro.

The best way for "oppressed" people to be liberated is through some joint effort by parties that really want to help out and assume responsibility, or by supporting a revolution that naturally takes over. I don't think there's been any cases of success from this process of forcibly removing the dictator, and crossing your fingers that things will go well.

Re: Trump says Venezuela’s Maduro captured after strikes

#689
post #600

A lot of Venezuelans are happy about it. Maduro is not good for Venezuela. The US should not be the decider of who stays in power on another country. The president should not have the power to apprehend a countries president IN THEIR COUNTRY without a process thats more than just "I really want it". The US is giving another clear message that it does not care about global order, just global control. We're back in the…

Perhaps people forget that countries are sovereign and can do whatever they want. The "global order" has always been based on strength: the stronger do what they want and the weaker do what they can.

What the US have just done is not something new because of Trump.

We are told about "international law" and "norms" so much that we perhaps forget that this is mostly BS.

Post reply on HN