11–20 of 95 posts
Nice, but NES emulator is one of the most written pet projects anywhere, which makes it considerably less impressive.
Git wrote a functional NES emulator for me by simply cloning one of the many publicly available ones!
Give it copy paste / translate tasks and it’s a no brainer (quite literally)
But same can be said of humans.
The question here is, did it implement it because it read the available online documentation about the NES architecture OR did it just see one too many of such implementations.
It’s a shame that the source code isn’t commented and documented more. At the very least, I would see it being helpful to add some documentation for every CPU op code being emulated.
Github alone has +4k NES emulator projects: https://github.com/search?q=nes%20emulator&type=repositories
This is more like "wow, it can quote training data".
Who care what it did. What did you learn? To live is to learn.
Who care what it did. What did you learn? To live is to learn.
I'd be curious in how well it passes 100th Coin's NES accuracy tests https://github.com/100thCoin/AccuracyCoin
That being said, it doesn't answer the "why" in the first place, an even more important question. At least though it does help somehow to compare with existing alternatives.
Who care what it did. What did you learn? To live is to learn.
When I consider the utility of a hammer, my first priority is to ask what the hammer can teach me.
This endeavor had negative net value.