Live data from Hacker News

CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

spectrum.ieee.org

181–190 of 320 posts

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#181

Peacetime technology from people who ignore the shooting war next door. Do you really want to build your energy system on huge soft targets? This looks much more vulnerable than solar arrays or battery installations to small-to-medium warheads (i.e anything from $500 FPV drones with an RPG round to $100k middle strike drones with 100 kg of payload).

No reason this couldn't be put underground, except cost.

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#182
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are way cheaper options than the Anker Solix 3800. Here are some options, in no particular order: - $3,300: 10 kWh with 2x EG4 WallMount Indoor 100Ah. - $3,110: 14 kWh with 1x WallMount Indoor 280Ah. - $2,690: 10 kWh with 1x Deye RW F10.2 B - Will Prowse's YouTube channel has reviewed several battery builds that are >10 kWh and near $2,000, but they're DIY assembly.

And still much more than the cost of the solar panels, which was GP's point.

GP only has two panels that generate 960 W (I’m going to generously assume NMOT and not STC). That’s hardly anything, and certainly not what I would use to try and charge 10 kWh of battery like they’re suggesting.

But sure, I agree it would help if battery prices came down.

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#183
post #176
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t stay there: EVs are even reporting consumption in terms of kWh/100km or kWh/100miles instead of just average kW.

What people care about when talking about EVs and consumption is generally how much distance they can cover. If you take away the distance factor and just report power, it becomes meaningless/almost useless.

Many people think of driving in time rather than distance. I'd say it's actually more common to say a city is 3 hours away rather than 200 miles.

What makes kW less useful is really just that most EVs don't advertise their capacity very prominently. But if you knew you had an 80 kWh battery and the car uses 20 kW at freeway speeds, then it's easy to see that it'll drive for 4 hours.

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#184
post #109

> The tried-and-true grid-scale storage option—pumped hydro [--> https://spectrum.ieee.org/a-big-hydro-project-in-big-sky-cou... ], in which water is pumped between reservoirs at different elevations—lasts for decades and can store thousands of megawatts for days. > Media reports show renderings of domes but give widely varying storage capacities [--> https://www.bloominglobal.com/media/detail/worlds-largest-co... ]—…

If 1 watt is 1 joule per second then, honestly, what are we doing with watt-hours? Why can’t battery capacity be described in joules? And then charge and discharge being a function of voltage and current, could be represented in joules per unit time. Instead its watt-hours for capacity, watts for flow rate. Watt-hours… that’s joules / seconds * hours? This is cursed.

Yep, it's stupid from a units consistency pov. A bit like using calories instead of joules.

But on the other hand we also use hours for measuring time instead of kiloseconds...

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#185
post #137

I have two solar panels that can generate around 960w/hr. Both panels cost around $400 ($200x2). Cheap. Storing that energy is quite expensive. an Anker Solix 3800, which is around 3.8kwh, costs $2400 USD. To store 10kwh would cost $7200 USD (which gets us more than 10kwh). If that cost asymmetry can come down then it becomes feasible to use solar power to provide cheap/local electricity in poor countries at a house…

The YouTuber Will Prowse has an excellent site where he tracks his most recommended batteries (and other equipment like inverters) at any time. The prices are always changing, and there are new products all the time so check on the his list any time you are looking to buy:

https://www.mobile-solarpower.com

Like the other commenter said, batteries are a lot cheaper if you are willing to shop around. His top recommended budget battery today is a 4x your Anker Solix's capacity, and around 1/4th the price. You can find many 5kWh server rack batteries for under $1000 now.

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#187
post #137

I have two solar panels that can generate around 960w/hr. Both panels cost around $400 ($200x2). Cheap. Storing that energy is quite expensive. an Anker Solix 3800, which is around 3.8kwh, costs $2400 USD. To store 10kwh would cost $7200 USD (which gets us more than 10kwh). If that cost asymmetry can come down then it becomes feasible to use solar power to provide cheap/local electricity in poor countries at a house…

Wait that Anker Solix 3800 costs more than my 84kwh battery containing _car_ (3.8 kwh x 22 batteries)? Something not right.

Are you saying you bought an electric car with functional 84kwh pack for less than 3 grand? If so I think the outlier is you. That is a better deal than I have seen.

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#188
post #176
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t stay there: EVs are even reporting consumption in terms of kWh/100km or kWh/100miles instead of just average kW.

What people care about when talking about EVs and consumption is generally how much distance they can cover. If you take away the distance factor and just report power, it becomes meaningless/almost useless.

Directly reporting required power is still comparable among vehicles: 55kW vs 49kW, eg

Which is definitely less intuitive because it hasn't been introduced to the public, but is interchangeable in the same quirky way we already compare MPG (Distance/Volume) with lt/100KM (Volume/Distance)

Re: CO2 batteries that store grid energy take off globally

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True. Otherwise we would be using square meters for measuring gas mileage instead of miles-per-gallon (or litres-per-km) [1]. [1] https://what-if.xkcd.com/11/

> miles-per-gallon (or litres-per-km) [1]. The UK is metric except for distance and beer. So the disgusting ‘miles-per-litre’ is presumably needed too.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN