Co-founder here: We are an active team at Startup Weekend Columbia. We pitch tomorrow afternoon here's more about our company: http://blog.killthelandline.com/post/32529411766/about-us We are using Tropo with Heroku for the MVP.
Try Plivo instead - it's about a third of your current cost. $3/month is dramatically better than $10.
http://plivo.com/pricing/ (Disclaimer: I was in the same YC batch as Plivo. I do really like the service compared to Twilio or Tropo.)
Landlines have long been killed. Unless you didn't notice, Magic Jack killed 'em. It is much cheaper and it just works. You have to be really crazy to be paying $48 for the landlines.
The site looks good and the idea is useful to me. So useful that I wanted to sign up, but I really can't stand clicking "Sign Up Now" and being told "oops, we're not ready for you." If you're not ready, don't have a sign up button.
We're at startup weekend - hoping to have an MVP tomorrow for pitch. Working fervently right now!
Yep, this is a totally pointless product. It might've made sense a few years ago, but ever since Google Voice has been out, this has been possible for free.
I disagree. Nobody outside the tech community knows that Google Voice exists, let alone how to use it. This has solid branding (esp. the name) and good messaging. The price might be a little high for what it's doing, but if the idea is to eventually phase out your landline number, this could be a good way of doing it.
I had to login just reply to this... Google Voice is used by all kinds of people. I can think of at least ten people over the age of 50 in my family alone who use it. Hell, my 81 year old grandfather has a GV account that forwards his old landline to his cell.
Almost every one of my non-tech friends uses it as well.
$10 a month just to forward calls from an old number? Why would I not just port that number to Google Voice, then forward my GV calls to my cell phone, all for a grand total of FREE?
You would do just that. I doubt, however, this website is targeted at the Hacker News crowd. If my inlaws wanted to get rid of their landline and get individual cell phones and needed their old number to transfer out, they wouldn't port their number to Google Voice and then forward from Google Voice to their cell phone. I'm also not sure if paying $10 / month is attractive to consumers, but that's just speculation!
You're exactly right, we think the target market is older and less comfortable with technology than the Hacker News crowd. The most common reaction we get when we pitch the service to someone is "I wouldn't need that, but it could be great for my parents/grandparents/inlaws/etc". Ideas about how to best appeal and market to this demographic are welcome.
Interesting. I'm trying to get my parents to drop their Charter landline - which, yes, is $40/mo, and yes, they both have cell phones - but they haven't wanted to because it'd be difficult to get everyone to change the numbers. I think the biggest aspect of this is the "redirect to two numbers" - my parents would love that, since they would both be able to get the messages. How does it handle voicemail, though? It ca…
My parents are in this exact same position. They have never heard of Google Voice but paying for an expensive landline.
I would immediately recommend a service like this.
Interesting. I'm trying to get my parents to drop their Charter landline - which, yes, is $40/mo, and yes, they both have cell phones - but they haven't wanted to because it'd be difficult to get everyone to change the numbers. I think the biggest aspect of this is the "redirect to two numbers" - my parents would love that, since they would both be able to get the messages. How does it handle voicemail, though? It ca…
This is the exact same problem my parents have. They pay $50/mo for a landline that rarely gets used but still need because no one will call them on their cells.
I can't imagine trying to explain Google Voice to my parents.