Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is supported by a majority of the US. The election was fairly close. The winning candidate got elected by a coalition of people with differing views on an number of individual items within his platform. That does not equate to certain approval by the majority of the American population of any of the things the linked article recounts. All that said, as an American living abroad who votes left, the use of terms…
> The election was fairly close. Yeah but "the totalitarian Neonazis who wanted to deploy secret police were only a slight majority" is really faint praise.
I Want You to Understand Chicago
121–130 of 532 posts
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#122This is really sad to read! Can folks who live in Chicago confirm/deny/comment on the extent to which this article gets it right? (I have no reason to believe that it's an exaggeration, but I sincerely hope that it is.)
https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-new-yorker-radio-hour/...
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#123[flagged]
Or if it's about black-on-black crime, maybe there's something to look into with affirmative action?
Cops against blacks? ACAB or kneeling at football games ringing any bells?
Sarcasm aside, one difference here is that the government is trashing your neighbourhood on your dime. You have to listen to republicans say there's no money for healthcare while they spend money on deploying troops to shoot priests with pepper bullets and trying to deport citizens.
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#124Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
And of course now the parent post is "flagged." Thank you, Libertarian overlords, from protecting the tech community from this dangerous content.
They unflagged it, but the pause in upvotes means it dropped off the front page and out of people's minds.
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#126Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The election was fairly close. Yeah but "the totalitarian Neonazis who wanted to deploy secret police were only a slight majority" is really faint praise.
No, my point was that in a close election that depended on a party building coalitions between heterogenous groups of voters, the people in favor of any particular action taken by the elected government may be a minority of the population, not even a slight majority.
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
They unflagged it, but the pause in upvotes means it dropped off the front page and out of people's minds.
Mission accomplished for the flaggers. I don't know why HN can't/won't fix this obvious abuse mechanism.
Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#129Re: I Want You to Understand Chicago
#130This is really sad to read! Can folks who live in Chicago confirm/deny/comment on the extent to which this article gets it right? (I have no reason to believe that it's an exaggeration, but I sincerely hope that it is.)
It is really bad. A glimmer of hope is a governor with a spine. https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-new-yorker-radio-hour/...
He doesn't have a spine, he has an election strategy.