[flagged]
That is a great insult!
121–130 of 214 posts
[flagged]
That is a great insult!
Seems to confirm Elon Musk is evil, no? Especially when considered along with his political "antics" and behaviors? Gaslighting at this scale is unconscionable.
[flagged]
Took me a while after that to accept it wasn't just an aberration.
My perspective now is that it continues a pattern of behaviour also seen with his response to Top Gear; it's just that when he reacted to Top Gear, I had an even lower regard for Top Gear…
> I don't know that "evil" is a really useful word to fling around, full stop, because it's actually quite subjective.
I agree. FWIW, I think "evil" is mostly a strong overlap with dark triad personality: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad
But clearly the word is used far more broadly, and it does not reliably keep any meaning from one person to the next.
This reminds me of a joke website I pondered making a few years ago 'provemeright.com'. If you are in a bar and you make an outrageous claim and don't want to back down, provemeright.com has your back! Give us 10 min and we will edit wikipedia and create a website with your 'fact' on it!... It was a funny joke when it wasn't real.
Wikipedia, and it's volunteer of editors are extremely quick at checking edits. In university, we once create a page for my room mate and listed his admirable, but odd quirks. It was taken down in a matter of minutes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sadly this always works. It has never failed.
Much of Eastern Europe has seen rapid improvements since the fall of the Soviet Union. Moldova elected a pro-EU instead of sliding into alt-right territory. So to declare it (or anything) never fails is never going to be true. Looking to Russia as an example, what hasn't been failing? They went from being #2 to being a a pariah state
'Coup Against Reality Itself' seems a bit of an over reaction to Musk's attempt to do a slightly less woke version of Wikipedia. If you try reading it, it's not terrible. It waffles on a bit in the usual LLM fashion. There's some HN discussion of it here which got flagged for some reason https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45726459
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because I dont know who this person is, this sentence gives me absolutely no information about the subject or the person posting it.
The highest post in the chain we're in: >PSA: author is Alejandra Caraballo [...] The reply: >Yep, this whole article is basically just -->his My reply: >Alejandra Caraballo is a woman. I'm correcting them.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for the reply. "an alternative Wikipedia with a different editorial bias" I think the stated goal is to reduce bias, not to just rotate it to another view. Of course some things are difficult to reduce to facts, but plenty of others are not.
> reduce bias, not to just rotate it to another view This is not possible.
[flagged]
people on the autism spectrum are amazingly good at what they're good at and spectacularly bad at what they're bad at. I wish Musk would just stick to what he's good at like SpaceX and Tesla etc.
Is he even good at rockets and cars or is he just good at hyping them up and attracting funding?
Cars… not great, but good enough to turn Tesla from a joke into an OK company selling in a "Blue Ocean"* market. Which isn't nothing, but then a bunch of other electric car companies popped up and now Tesla cars are solidly B-tier… well, except for the Cybertruck which is just a flop.
Seems to confirm Elon Musk is evil, no? Especially when considered along with his political "antics" and behaviors? Gaslighting at this scale is unconscionable.
I think how he treated his daughter or bribed women to have his kids was already pretty bad? this isn't really news about musk being morally awful