Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults • Hacker News Board

johannes1234321 wrote: post #13

fgsfds4000 wrote: post #9

Cool, I've always wanted to share my intimate desires with creepy tech bros

Oh no worries, worst case it will be leaked once you run for office somewhere ;)

What about the people currently in office?

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#34

Post by basisword » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:21 PM UTC

"We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems..."

I dread to think where society is going to be in 10-15 years. We've had a generation or two raised thinking porn == sex and the next generation will all be in romantic relationships with ChatGPT. Businesses have just given up on having any social responsibility whatsoever.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#35

Post by luismedel » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM UTC

amelius wrote: post #15

cranberryturkey wrote: post #2

The internet is good for two things. Sharing research and sharing porn.

It's also great for spreading conspiracy theories and fake news.

Another kind of porn?

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#36

Post by p0w3n3d » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM UTC

fishmicrowaver wrote: post #17

subscribed wrote: post #8

OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?

Perhaps they intend to collect gov ID's?

and if you don't send them ID the Chat will start responding "oh you little tike, that's something we need to ask your daddy if we're allowed to tell you"

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#37

Post by basisword » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM UTC

subscribed wrote: post #8

OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?

>> I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18".

Why presume that? "Are you over 18?" is the age verification method used by 99% of the web.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#38

Post by onlyrealcuzzo » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM UTC

tiahura wrote: post #26

siva7 wrote: post #18

You have to pay some respect to sama. Imagine this move done by Google, Meta, Amazon or Microsoft: It won't happen.

Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?

Typically not a good sign when a company resorts to selling porn.

Didn't work well for Tumblr, not working well for Twitter, maybe AI is different.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#39

Post by pj4533 » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:22 PM UTC

fishmicrowaver wrote: post #17

subscribed wrote: post #8

OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?

Perhaps they intend to collect gov ID's?

They already do. If you want to use gpt-5 with the new responses API, I had to upload my id.

Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults

#40

Post by tiahura » Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 1:23 PM UTC

fkyoureadthedoc wrote: post #28

tiahura wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?

Why desperate? There's clearly a demand for it.

He literally said on the August podcast that they wouldn’t do it because it would be a short-term gimmick. As I type, CNBC (who pumps them every hour of the day) is talking about how suspicious it looks.