[dead]
Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
21–30 of 80 posts
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#22[dead]
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#23OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?
I assume you will need to do a Blockchain Iris scan from his other company in order to prove your Age and Identity.
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#24OK, and what's the problem with that specifically? I presume they will use more sophisticated methods for age assurance than "I'm 18". Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages (including Claude and ChatGPT), so the only difference is that the non-NSFW behaviour will be better (less crippled). Win/win. No? Why?
> Besides, people are using LLMs for exactly that for ages Hey! How old are you!?
[dead]
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#25Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#26You have to pay some respect to sama. Imagine this move done by Google, Meta, Amazon or Microsoft: It won't happen.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#27Cool, I've always wanted to share my intimate desires with creepy tech bros
Always a new account with some snarky neo-luddite reply, as if Google, or Facebook, or Microsoft, or Amazon, doesn't already know everything there is to know about you. I mean, come on. That ship has sailed at least two decades ago and this kind of conversation simply isn't productive imo.
This is a ridiculous attitude, exactly equivalent to 'if you've nothing to fear you've nothing to hide'. In practice different geographic localities (e.g.: EU, California) have far different (and improving) limits on the personal information that can be stored by companies and how it is used.
Various forms of online hygiene, from ad blocking to VPNs, to anonymous email accounts are likely utilised by the hacker news audience. Because we're all well aware of the value of our privacy, the value of our personal data, and the aggressive and often illegal efforts by major tech firms and data brokers to acquire both.
It's incredibly important to continue progress in the area, both in terms of informing the public (and politicians) of how our behaviour is observed and shaped by social networks and big tech: and by taking all obvious and easily available measures to reduce and remove the information they have and continue to gather.
One obvious way is by not sharing private sexual data with a major corporation, where not absolutely necessary.
Edit: Oh, and since a reference to the Luddites is a regular thought terminating cliche on HN - https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2021/06/the-luddites-wer...
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#28You have to pay some respect to sama. Imagine this move done by Google, Meta, Amazon or Microsoft: It won't happen.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
Why desperate? There's clearly a demand for it.
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#29"Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools" Huh? Quite the statement when there are still people out there having parasocial relationships with chatbots. This problem is going to get exponentially worse when the chatbots can start to get sexual.
What do you mean start? It's been a thing the whole time
Re: Chat-GPT becomes Sex-GPT for verified adults
#30You have to pay some respect to sama. Imagine this move done by Google, Meta, Amazon or Microsoft: It won't happen.
Kind of reeks of desperation. And, given what’s been alleged about him personally, it seems odd. Is this something MS is on board with?
If so, it's a clever strategic move as they know that most of their competition will struggle to allow such a policy because they can't move so fast on such morally loaded topics like OAI.