Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
1–10 of 679 posts
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#2Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#3I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#4Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#5Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#6Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#7I have a 920+, and it’s too slow, frequently becomes unresponsive when multiple tasks are run.
They lag, and need to be constantly forced to improve?
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#8What did NAS customers purchase instead?
Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#9Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs
#10So you can't buy 3rd party HDDs --- but Synology can?
Looks likes a blatant FU to the customer was returned in kind.