Live data from Hacker News

Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

guru3d.com

1–10 of 679 posts

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#3
Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives.

I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#5

Thank god they reversed course. I’m coming up on needing another NAS and I was not looking forward to digging through alternatives. I’ve run raw Linux servers, I’ve run UnRaid, and now I have Synology and it’s been the best “set it and forget it” solution yet. Yes, the hardware is overpriced but it works and I’m willing to pay a premium for that.

If you just want storage and not apps, Ubiquiti's UNAS line is a much better choice, especially if you're in their ecosystem.

Re: Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs

#7
But their hardware is also terrible. Their disk stations for consumers had 1G NICs until recently, and still underpowered CPUs. The sales had to decline for them to be convinced to upgrade to 2.5G in 2025. But then they removed an optional slot for 10G in 923+ model (they still would have made money from it, as it costs +$150), so when the industry moves to 10G, you can’t upgrade the component and should buy the whole unit. The construction is plastic.

I have a 920+, and it’s too slow, frequently becomes unresponsive when multiple tasks are run.

They lag, and need to be constantly forced to improve?

Post reply on HN