Live data from Hacker News

How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

cnn.com

371–380 of 1001 posts

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As you say definitions matter - so let's not invent hypothetical scenarios to dismiss points. Israel was not arguing about the definition of 'acute malnourished'. The threshold for famine is 15%. The IPC said it had just hit 16% and was thus a famine. Israel was arguing that other data showed it was only 12.2-13.5% and therefore not a famine. When you get to the point of arguing "only 12% of the children are starving…

> When you get to the point of arguing "only 12% of the children are starving, not 16%" you probably shouldn't bother Devil's advocate: we grow enough food to feed every human. What we lack is the logistics. War disrupts logistics. Food insecurity rising is thus, unfortunately, an expected (and probably unmitigatable) consequence of war. That's why we have to define a line, based on history and capability, that sets…

Famine is not an inevitable outcome of war. It is the inevitable outcome of Israel's deliberate actions to limit access to food, which are well-documented.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#372
post #4

There is simply no excuse for blocking the entry of food into a region wholesale. For that alone they should, at the very least, be an outcast in the international community. But here we are.

The claim I've heard them make is that the food aid is making it in, but being stolen by Hamas so that it can be resold at markup. How do you convince people that believe this that it isn't true (or is irrelevant)?

What's the best way of reducing this markup if it were true? Not sending in aid (no supply = lots of demand) or flooding the area with aid?

Seems to me, if the claim is true, Israel is trying to give Hamas more power, not less.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#374
post #23

The Trump peace plan calls for a resumption of aid contingent on the Palestinians accepting the deal. Please understand that this is a war crime. You can not use starvation of civilians as a weapon or as leverage against combatants.

> this is a war crime. You can not use starvation of civilians as a weapon or as leverage against combatants

America withholding its own aid is not a war crime.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#376
post #29
post #4

There is simply no excuse for blocking the entry of food into a region wholesale. For that alone they should, at the very least, be an outcast in the international community. But here we are.

That they have the backing and blessing of the US government is the counter-argument to this. The US can almost unilaterally end this war if they want to.

> US can almost unilaterally end this war if they want to

Almost but not quite.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#377
> How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza

Way to whitewash a genocide. The title make it sound like the famine is accidental or an unintended consequence of Israel's "actions". While in reality, it's the sole purpose of what Israel is doing in Gaza for years, they are conducting a genocide, plain and simple.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As you say definitions matter - so let's not invent hypothetical scenarios to dismiss points. Israel was not arguing about the definition of 'acute malnourished'. The threshold for famine is 15%. The IPC said it had just hit 16% and was thus a famine. Israel was arguing that other data showed it was only 12.2-13.5% and therefore not a famine. When you get to the point of arguing "only 12% of the children are starving…

> When you get to the point of arguing "only 12% of the children are starving, not 16%" you probably shouldn't bother Devil's advocate: we grow enough food to feed every human. What we lack is the logistics. War disrupts logistics. Food insecurity rising is thus, unfortunately, an expected (and probably unmitigatable) consequence of war. That's why we have to define a line, based on history and capability, that sets…

There is enough food to feed the children but Israel won't let the food in. Not logistics someone trying to kill them and claiming to be the victim.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Question: There is a repeated claim that more calories have been provided to the Gaza people than several other human crisis scenarios, but that Hamas is currently stealing it all. This claim is made by supporters of the war _outside of Israel_ for external consumption. If you look at what the Israeli cabinet, generals and politicians are saying for internal consumption... it's pretty deliberate.

UN data, compare numbers "arrived" and "intercepted": https://app.un2720.org/tracking are you saying un supports the war then?

Intercepted is defined as "either peacefully by hungry people or forcefully by armed actors, during transit in Gaza." Some fraction of that may be Hamas. But we have no evidence of that.

Re: How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza, visualized

#380

> How Israeli actions caused famine in Gaza Way to whitewash a genocide. The title make it sound like the famine is accidental or an unintended consequence of Israel's "actions". While in reality, it's the sole purpose of what Israel is doing in Gaza for years, they are conducting a genocide, plain and simple.

Is there any difference between carrying it out and intending to carry it out if given the chance? From the river to the sea?
Post reply on HN