Live data from Hacker News

Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

browser.geekbench.com

311–320 of 565 posts

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nice. Lots of people still claim that M1 is super duper fast but now we're at almost twice the performance!

What is that, 6 years for less than a doubling? Nothing against the Apple chips themselves, but gone are the days of Moore...

Moore was just about the transistor count doubling. Not performance.

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#312
post #5

Nice. The iPads generally measure around ~8% slower than the MacBooks, I guess for cooling reasons. So we should see approximately a 4400 single core Geekbench score for the MacBook series. This is nice. Single thread MacBook progression on Geekbench: M1: 2350 M2: 2600 M3: 3100 M4: 3850 M5: 4400 (estimated) https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks

Amazing. Thanks for the comparison to the older gen. Here’s hoping the chips they put in the Airs can get more than 32 maybe even 64GB of ram

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, working with M1 daily I struggle with resource contention and slow py/js builds. I'd love something faster when work provides me with updated device.

My m1 16gb pro gets throttled (and manually restarted) every time vs code hits 100gb ram usage when running jest unit tests. Don’t know who to blame but 99% sure the problem is my source code and not the machine.

Chrome eats all my resources too and I have 128GB of ram. Some pages like ClickUp and the Google cloud console (bigquery) eat something like 3-5GB

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#314
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are a number of interesting creative apps for iPad that can make full use of its capabilities. A good example is Nomad Sculpt. There's also CAD software, many DAWs. I haven't tested Numbers yet but I would assume its fairly well optimized. This really reminds me of the 80/20 articles that made the frontpage yesterday. Just because a lot of HN users lament the fact that their 20% needs (can't run an LLM or compi…

I work with Logic Pro X often. I bought an iPad Pro M4 and the Logic version for it is really compelling. Touch faders and the UI are well thought out. The problem is they want me to subscribe to use it. I wish I could just outright purchase it for $300.

They should charge less if offering one-time. $300 only beats $50/year after 6-7 years, depending on the discount value you would assign to a present value calculation. In software it's more typical to calibrate that around 2-3 years. I like the design as well.

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#315

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you are confused. There are two drivers here. The kernel space driver mostly developed by lina. And the user space driver developed by Alyssa. Both are drivers. And of the two the user space driver is an order of magnitude more complex.

Alyssa's userspace work that I've already mentioned has been completed and upstreamed? > We are pleased to announce that our graphics driver userspace API (uAPI) has been merged into the Linux kernel. This major milestone allows us to finally enable OpenGL, OpenCL and Vulkan support for Apple Silicon in upstream Mesa.

Sure for M1/M2 it's somewhat correct that it is "completed". M3 and beyond have a lot of GPU differences though(A completely new microcode afaik), so the loss is still traumatic. I also don't think GPU perf is on the level of OSX though I did not do a recent one to one bench.

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like you need to spend some time optimising your build. Faster hardware just makes developers lazy. I'm still on an M1 and it's fine, although I do have 32GB.

Could you clarify more, AFAIK there is no M1 with 32gb ram machine.

M1 Pro

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#317
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right but what if I don't notice the difference between rendering a web page taking 100ms and it taking 50ms? What if I don't notice the difference between video playback consuming 20% of the chip's available compute and it consuming 10%?

I'm pretty sure that users of the announced Blender for iPad port will notice any additional horsepower.

what users?

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they both top out at 60 they are equally fast. One just had better acceleration than the other

Top speed hardly matters for cars. Acceleration is where fun is. Not sure this applies to CPUs at all.

Any cpu can run at 100ghz for 1 cycle. The trick is getting it to run at 100ghz forever

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

M1 is still fast, the speed of its successors does not change that.

I use one for software development and it's great. Sometimes rust builds are slow and I'd love to force that to be faster with hardware (optimizing build time would be a huge undertaking with not-so-great returns), otherwise I'm totally content. I also have an M2 Max with 32GB of RAM that still feels like magic. I've never had computers that felt so fast for so long.

I have i7-4790k that still seems to score almost 1500 on single core benchmark: that thing felt fast for decade+.

Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you clarify more, AFAIK there is no M1 with 32gb ram machine.

M1 Pro

Well it's quite different from the M1. Please don't mix it. It like saying i3 and i7 is the same if they are on the same generation.
Post reply on HN