Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nice. Lots of people still claim that M1 is super duper fast but now we're at almost twice the performance!
What is that, 6 years for less than a doubling? Nothing against the Apple chips themselves, but gone are the days of Moore...
Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
311–320 of 565 posts
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#312Nice. The iPads generally measure around ~8% slower than the MacBooks, I guess for cooling reasons. So we should see approximately a 4400 single core Geekbench score for the MacBook series. This is nice. Single thread MacBook progression on Geekbench: M1: 2350 M2: 2600 M3: 3100 M4: 3850 M5: 4400 (estimated) https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
I dunno, working with M1 daily I struggle with resource contention and slow py/js builds. I'd love something faster when work provides me with updated device.
My m1 16gb pro gets throttled (and manually restarted) every time vs code hits 100gb ram usage when running jest unit tests. Don’t know who to blame but 99% sure the problem is my source code and not the machine.
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are a number of interesting creative apps for iPad that can make full use of its capabilities. A good example is Nomad Sculpt. There's also CAD software, many DAWs. I haven't tested Numbers yet but I would assume its fairly well optimized. This really reminds me of the 80/20 articles that made the frontpage yesterday. Just because a lot of HN users lament the fact that their 20% needs (can't run an LLM or compi…
I work with Logic Pro X often. I bought an iPad Pro M4 and the Logic version for it is really compelling. Touch faders and the UI are well thought out. The problem is they want me to subscribe to use it. I wish I could just outright purchase it for $300.
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you are confused. There are two drivers here. The kernel space driver mostly developed by lina. And the user space driver developed by Alyssa. Both are drivers. And of the two the user space driver is an order of magnitude more complex.
Alyssa's userspace work that I've already mentioned has been completed and upstreamed? > We are pleased to announce that our graphics driver userspace API (uAPI) has been merged into the Linux kernel. This major milestone allows us to finally enable OpenGL, OpenCL and Vulkan support for Apple Silicon in upstream Mesa.
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#316Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#317Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right but what if I don't notice the difference between rendering a web page taking 100ms and it taking 50ms? What if I don't notice the difference between video playback consuming 20% of the chip's available compute and it consuming 10%?
I'm pretty sure that users of the announced Blender for iPad port will notice any additional horsepower.
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#318Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they both top out at 60 they are equally fast. One just had better acceleration than the other
Top speed hardly matters for cars. Acceleration is where fun is. Not sure this applies to CPUs at all.
Re: Leaked Apple M5 9 core Geekbench scores
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
M1 is still fast, the speed of its successors does not change that.
I use one for software development and it's great. Sometimes rust builds are slow and I'd love to force that to be faster with hardware (optimizing build time would be a huge undertaking with not-so-great returns), otherwise I'm totally content. I also have an M2 Max with 32GB of RAM that still feels like magic. I've never had computers that felt so fast for so long.