“I want to note our appreciation for the reporting of the Guardian,” [Microsoft’s vice-chair and president, Brad Smith] wrote, noting that it had brought to light “information we could not access in light of our customer privacy commitments”. He added: “Our review is ongoing.” Its interesting that they seem to be saying they dont know the full details of how their customers are using Azure, due to privacy commitments…
The whole point of confidential computing is that the cloud provider can't access your data and can't tell what you're doing with it. This is a must have requirement in many government contracts and other highly legislated fields.
Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
121–130 of 894 posts
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#122I am seeing several kneejerk "Microsoft bad" reactions here, which HNers don't do for many other companies. I encourage many of you to read what is written. They listened to their internal staff and stakeholders and public pressure, and did terminated the contract instead of ignoring it or doubling down. That is a good thing.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they act on information their employees report, they are violating their commitments.
There have been public reports by major news organizations on the subject of Israel using big tech companies to surveil the West Bank and Gaza, for a decade. This isn't an issue of customer privacy.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know if it's _true_, but it seems right? I don't want Microsoft to have this level of visibility into my usage of Azure, just like I don't want my phone provider to eavesdrop on my conversations. I'm no privacy ayatollah, but this seems like a reasonable amount of privacy from Microsoft
Well, the average org isn't out there literally committing genocide
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder why IDC choose the Netherlands location. Microsoft has one Azure region in Israel itself: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/reliability/regions-...
Why build something near or semi near conflict?
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The word genocide has a legal definition, it’s not up for discussion or debate. What is happening in Gaza is a genocide according to genocide scholars.
But here we have UN and other twisting it to fit a situation that clearly weren't meant to be covered by it.
Because if the war in Gaza can be called a genocide so can almost every single other major war!
Also it is absolutely ridiculous to call a war that is started by one side, and one that only that side can end, a genocide against the same side that started it!
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know if it's _true_, but it seems right? I don't want Microsoft to have this level of visibility into my usage of Azure, just like I don't want my phone provider to eavesdrop on my conversations. I'm no privacy ayatollah, but this seems like a reasonable amount of privacy from Microsoft
Privacy ayatollah? Is that like an infosec shah?
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
The word genocide has a legal definition, it’s not up for discussion or debate. What is happening in Gaza is a genocide according to genocide scholars.
Legal definitions are often up for discussion and debate. That’s a large part of what lawyers do, in fact. Anyway I have no comment on the specific claim being made here, I just really dislike it when discussion is stifled by saying “I’m right and no one can ever disagree”.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#129It would be only just if the Palestinians would get their own state after this.
Right of return for all Palestinians and their descendants, worldwide.
It's not their land to 'return to' - after all, people already live there and they have no moral right to displace them.
Re: Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its tech in mass surveillance of Palestinians
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
The word genocide has a legal definition, it’s not up for discussion or debate. What is happening in Gaza is a genocide according to genocide scholars.
This is a bit off topic but there isn't anything more debated in history than legal definitions. Maybe religious scripture? I don't think you could have raised a weaker point.