Why not verify these reports using LLMs first?
It's the same problem, false positives.
You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
31–40 of 571 posts
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#32It's kind of depressing to read Daniel's article[1] on this issue given the rising "popularity" of these lazy attempts at cash grabbing. I hope they manage to combat the AI slop in a way that does not involve fighting fire with fire though.
[1] https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2025/07/14/death-by-a-thousand-s...
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're doing it wrong: You should just feed other peoples AI-generated responses into your own AI tools and let the tool answer for you! The loop is then closed, no human time wasted, and the only effect is wasted energy to run the AI tools. It's the perfect business model to turn energy into money.
You joke, but some companies are pushing this idea unironically by putting "use AI to expand a short message into a bloated mess" and "use AI to turn a bloated mess into a brief summary" into both sides of the same product. Good job everyone, we've invented the opposite of data compression.
The next HTTP standard should include `Transfer-Encoding: polite` for AI-enabled servers and user agents.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#34Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…
Is it that crazy? He's doing exactly what the AI boosters have told him to do.
Like, do LLMs have actual applications? Yes. By virtue of using one, are you by definition a lazy know-nothing? No. Are they seemingly quite purpose-built for lazy know-nothings to help them bullshit through technical roles? Yeah, kinda.
In my mind this is this tech working exactly as intended. From the beginning the various companies have been quite open about the fact that this tech is (supposed to) free you from having to know... anything, really. And then we're shocked when people listen to the marketing. The executives are salivating at the notion of replacing development staff with virtual machines that generate software, but if they can't have that, they'll be just as happy to export their entire development staff to a country where they can pay every member of it in spoons. And yeah, the software they make might barely function but who cares, it barely functions now.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#35What is the motivation behind posting such things? I understand if there is a bug bounty program, does cURL have one?
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#36Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…
Makes me wonder whether the submitter even speaks english
AI's other acronym...
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some people actually do that on Github too. Absolute psychopaths.
I think the JS/Node scene was the pioneer in spamming emojis absolutely everywhere, well before AI. Maybe that's where the models picked it up from.
I really hate all those CLI applications and terminal configurations that look like circus came to town.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#38Why not verify these reports using LLMs first?
Once you're at the 12th month of trying to shoehorn LLMs in several use cases at your job, you'll find the answer to this question:
BECAUSE YOU CAN'T FUCKING TRUST THOSE LYING HALLUCINATING PIECES OF SHIT.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#39Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#40"I heard you were extremely quick at math" Me: "yes, as a matter of fact I am" Interviewer: "Whats 14x27" Me: "49" Interviewer: "that's not even close" me: "yeah, but it was fast"
The lowest latency responses in my load tests is when something went wrong!