Crazy how he doubled down by just pasting badger's answer into Chat and submitting the (hilariously obvious AI) reply: > Thanks for the quick review. You’re right — my attached PoC does not exercise libcurl and therefore does not demonstrate a cURL bug. I retract the cookie overflow claim and apologize for the noise. Please close this report as invalid. If helpful, I can follow up separately with a minimal C reproduc…
You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
21–30 of 571 posts
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#22Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#23I suppose there's a reason why kids are usually banned from using calculators during their first years of school when they're learning basic math.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're doing it wrong: You should just feed other peoples AI-generated responses into your own AI tools and let the tool answer for you! The loop is then closed, no human time wasted, and the only effect is wasted energy to run the AI tools. It's the perfect business model to turn energy into money.
You joke, but some companies are pushing this idea unironically by putting "use AI to expand a short message into a bloated mess" and "use AI to turn a bloated mess into a brief summary" into both sides of the same product. Good job everyone, we've invented the opposite of data compression.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#25I wonder where the balance of “Actual time saved for me” vs “Everyone else's time wasted” lies in this technological “revolution”.
You're doing it wrong: You should just feed other peoples AI-generated responses into your own AI tools and let the tool answer for you! The loop is then closed, no human time wasted, and the only effect is wasted energy to run the AI tools. It's the perfect business model to turn energy into money.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
At some point they told ChatGPT to put emoji's everywhere which is also a dead giveaway on the original report that it's AI. They're the new em dash.
Some people actually do that on Github too. Absolute psychopaths.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#27But frankly security theatre was always going to descend into this with a thousand wannabe l33ts targeting big projects with LLMs to be "that guy" who found some "bug" and "saved the world".
Shellshock showed how bad a large part of the industry is. It was not a bug. "Fixing" it caused a lot of old tried and tested solutions to break, but hey, we as an industry need to protect against the lowest common denominator who refuse to learn better...
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#28I wonder where the balance of “Actual time saved for me” vs “Everyone else's time wasted” lies in this technological “revolution”.
You're doing it wrong: You should just feed other peoples AI-generated responses into your own AI tools and let the tool answer for you! The loop is then closed, no human time wasted, and the only effect is wasted energy to run the AI tools. It's the perfect business model to turn energy into money.
Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#29Re: You did this with an AI and you do not understand what you're doing here
#30Jump to the point: https://hackerone.com/reports/3340109#:~:text=you%20did%20th...