Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you explain the conspiracy?
[flagged]
U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
101–110 of 802 posts
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#102Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#103TikTok dealt a serious blow to the Western consensus manufacturing apparatus. We saw that with Gaza especially. This deal is a step towards taking back control.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#104Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
IIRC, but I read the TikTok app is mostly WebViews, which was a design choice to help keep it functioning in the face of an App Store ban.
IIRC TikTok is built using their own framework, https://lynxjs.org/
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#106Oracle is then going to mandate license fees from every user, together with 22% support fees with 8% increase every year. They'll then rewrite TikTok in Java, and migrate to Oracle Database.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#107Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#108So Larry Ellison just took over Paramount group which is now looking to bid for Warner Brothers and CNN. And now Ellison is going to take over TikTok. Paramount(being run by Larry Ellison's son) is looking to install the pro-israel-propagandist who has variously masqueraded as a liberal, a conservative and anti-woke free-speech champion, Bari Weiss[1] as CBS's editor-in-chief or co-president[2]. It also bears mention…
Again? People should be talking about the hostile take-over currently in progress and how it is getting exponentially worse. But the billionaire mouthpieces gave everyone a shiny new inconsequential talking point and no one cares about anything that matters.
Re: U.S. investors, Trump close in on TikTok deal with China
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
We are doing state capitalism without China’s “serve the people” bit. Hm, maybe there’s a name for that type of government, idk.
> We are doing state capitalism without China’s “serve the people” bit. Hm, maybe there’s a name for that type of government, idk. Except China doesn't actually serve its people. Things are way more cut-throat there, with much less safety net. The Chinese government sees workers as grist for the mill, not something to be cared for.
Just because you have fewer full-body casts than someone who just got in a bad wreck, does not mean you are worse off.