I can't comment on the methodology used to rank the universities, but I think it's interesting that a specialised (as opposed to "fully comprehensive") university has come out on top. MIT would probably not be a great choice of university for someone looking to take an arts degree :-)
MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
11–20 of 54 posts
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#12Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#13More interestingly, Oxford overtook Cambridge in Computer Science :P
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#14Interesting how the UK manages to take 4 out of the top 6 places (yes, choosing 6 places does put the UK in the best light).
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#15http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2012.html
The Top ten universities listed there are
1 Harvard University 2 Stanford University 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 University of California, Berkeley 5 University of Cambridge 6 California Institute of Technology 7 Princeton University 8 Columbia University 9 University of Chicago 10 University of Oxford
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#16Clearly there is a need to capture certain metrics and display that as quantitative information, and the difference between, say, the top 10 and the 90-100 is probably relevant, but the difference within the top ~20 is so minimal its largely irrelevant.
It really galls me when people make decisions about undergraduate or graduate schools (or, probably employees, although this is a position I'm yet to be in) based on these kinds of rankings. Clearly it should factor to some extent (i.e. Harvard vs. Jeremey's University of Rubishville[1]) but there are MANY much more important factors to consider.
The irony is that the rankings are 50% opinion based, which basically amounts to identifying where people think are prestigious. I wonder what people use to identify which the prestigious universities are - they can't possible go and visit them all, but if only there were some kind of online ranking they could use to get an idea...
[1] When I went to undergraduate, this was the fictional university my younger brother suggested he might end up going to.
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#17I find the rankings from ARWU (a Shanghai-based institute) makes more sense. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2012.html The Top ten universities listed there are 1 Harvard University 2 Stanford University 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 University of California, Berkeley 5 University of Cambridge 6 California Institute of Technology 7 Princeton University 8 Columbia University 9 University of Chicag…
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#18I can't comment on the methodology used to rank the universities, but I think it's interesting that a specialised (as opposed to "fully comprehensive") university has come out on top. MIT would probably not be a great choice of university for someone looking to take an arts degree :-)
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#19Interesting how the UK manages to take 4 out of the top 6 places (yes, choosing 6 places does put the UK in the best light).
Maybe that's a totally superficial assessment, but in terms of the quality of facilities, research going on and the interaction I had with professors they were awesome. I don't think this is surprising though - the US is a lot bigger (and I visited a lot of the top universities) so you'd expect there to be more high quality institutions, because there are simply a lot more students/faculty.
This is why I find the UK occupying a lot of the top ten to be someone dubious. No slight against the British academic world, but four out of the top six when adjusted for funds and population just seems ridiculous.
Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings
#20Honestly, these rankings are [always] ridiculous. Clearly there is a need to capture certain metrics and display that as quantitative information, and the difference between, say, the top 10 and the 90-100 is probably relevant, but the difference within the top ~20 is so minimal its largely irrelevant. It really galls me when people make decisions about undergraduate or graduate schools (or, probably employees, altho…
As for the distinctions among the generally assumed top tier -- be it Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, or what have you -- these seem pretty irrelevant in praxis. Go to the school that interests you the most and is the best fit for you. If you should be so talented and lucky as to get into all of the best schools, you're probably the kind of person whose life isn't going to take a dramatic turn for the worse because some ranking system suddenly places your alma mater at #2 or #3.
The only two groups who place serious stock in the rankings are high schoolers and the chronically insecure.