Live data from Hacker News

MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

topuniversities.com

11–20 of 54 posts

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#11

I can't comment on the methodology used to rank the universities, but I think it's interesting that a specialised (as opposed to "fully comprehensive") university has come out on top. MIT would probably not be a great choice of university for someone looking to take an arts degree :-)

Indeed, Imperial College London is similar in this respect.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#13
post #4

More interestingly, Oxford overtook Cambridge in Computer Science :P

I loved Cambridge but honestly the Computer Science course was pretty poor. It won't have helped that the best first-year lecturer, Arthur Norman, retired recently.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#14

Interesting how the UK manages to take 4 out of the top 6 places (yes, choosing 6 places does put the UK in the best light).

It may have something to do with the fact that ranking organization is in the UK. The same thing happens with a few other 'academic' rankings I have seen.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#15
I find the rankings from ARWU (a Shanghai-based institute) makes more sense.

http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2012.html

The Top ten universities listed there are

1 Harvard University 2 Stanford University 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 University of California, Berkeley 5 University of Cambridge 6 California Institute of Technology 7 Princeton University 8 Columbia University 9 University of Chicago 10 University of Oxford

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#16
Honestly, these rankings are [always] ridiculous.

Clearly there is a need to capture certain metrics and display that as quantitative information, and the difference between, say, the top 10 and the 90-100 is probably relevant, but the difference within the top ~20 is so minimal its largely irrelevant.

It really galls me when people make decisions about undergraduate or graduate schools (or, probably employees, although this is a position I'm yet to be in) based on these kinds of rankings. Clearly it should factor to some extent (i.e. Harvard vs. Jeremey's University of Rubishville[1]) but there are MANY much more important factors to consider.

The irony is that the rankings are 50% opinion based, which basically amounts to identifying where people think are prestigious. I wonder what people use to identify which the prestigious universities are - they can't possible go and visit them all, but if only there were some kind of online ranking they could use to get an idea...

[1] When I went to undergraduate, this was the fictional university my younger brother suggested he might end up going to.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#17

I find the rankings from ARWU (a Shanghai-based institute) makes more sense. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2012.html The Top ten universities listed there are 1 Harvard University 2 Stanford University 3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 4 University of California, Berkeley 5 University of Cambridge 6 California Institute of Technology 7 Princeton University 8 Columbia University 9 University of Chicag…

Why does that make more sense? It's just different and equally as arbitrary a set of ranking criteria as the original article.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#18

I can't comment on the methodology used to rank the universities, but I think it's interesting that a specialised (as opposed to "fully comprehensive") university has come out on top. MIT would probably not be a great choice of university for someone looking to take an arts degree :-)

If the ranking is by perceived quality, then I guess this makes sense: it's much harder for an institution to be best in the world at many diverse subjects.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#19

Interesting how the UK manages to take 4 out of the top 6 places (yes, choosing 6 places does put the UK in the best light).

I have two degrees from the UK, and am currently doing a PhD in the US. During the application process I visited 8-10 different graduate schools in the states, and honestly, I felt like any one of them would be comfortably in the top 5 in the UK.

Maybe that's a totally superficial assessment, but in terms of the quality of facilities, research going on and the interaction I had with professors they were awesome. I don't think this is surprising though - the US is a lot bigger (and I visited a lot of the top universities) so you'd expect there to be more high quality institutions, because there are simply a lot more students/faculty.

This is why I find the UK occupying a lot of the top ten to be someone dubious. No slight against the British academic world, but four out of the top six when adjusted for funds and population just seems ridiculous.

Re: MIT overtakes Cambridge and Harvard to top spot in QS world university rankings

#20

Honestly, these rankings are [always] ridiculous. Clearly there is a need to capture certain metrics and display that as quantitative information, and the difference between, say, the top 10 and the 90-100 is probably relevant, but the difference within the top ~20 is so minimal its largely irrelevant. It really galls me when people make decisions about undergraduate or graduate schools (or, probably employees, altho…

The only ranking system that ever seems to matter is the generally assumed ranking within the public consciousness. It doesn't matter if John Doe University emerges from out of nowhere one year to unseat Harvard on some arbitrary list; the general public is still going to assume Harvard is a top school, and probably will not have heard of John Doe U.

As for the distinctions among the generally assumed top tier -- be it Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton, or what have you -- these seem pretty irrelevant in praxis. Go to the school that interests you the most and is the best fit for you. If you should be so talented and lucky as to get into all of the best schools, you're probably the kind of person whose life isn't going to take a dramatic turn for the worse because some ranking system suddenly places your alma mater at #2 or #3.

The only two groups who place serious stock in the rankings are high schoolers and the chronically insecure.

Post reply on HN