Earlier quoted context omitted.
With AI/robots doing all the work, money can be created and distributed based on production and logistical efficiency.
I would much rather have Capitalism and own my own work bots, thanks.
We'll need a universal basic income (UBI) in an AI-driven world
41–44 of 44 posts
Re: We'll need a universal basic income (UBI) in an AI-driven world
#42Everybody forgets that AI is just a computer. AI cannot dig ditches. AI cannot harvest crops. AI cannot frame a house, fix a car, or do anything else in the real, physical world. It will never do these things, not because of technical limitations, but because human labor is cheap and versatile. AI can only really take the jobs of those who sit at a computer all day. Even then, I suspect that the only people who reall…
Re: We'll need a universal basic income (UBI) in an AI-driven world
#43Everybody forgets that AI is just a computer. AI cannot dig ditches. AI cannot harvest crops. AI cannot frame a house, fix a car, or do anything else in the real, physical world. It will never do these things, not because of technical limitations, but because human labor is cheap and versatile. AI can only really take the jobs of those who sit at a computer all day. Even then, I suspect that the only people who reall…
Re: We'll need a universal basic income (UBI) in an AI-driven world
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
I seem to remember a Star Trek episode (not sure which series) where a character is talking about how they’ve evolved past the need for money. Badly paraphrased, and maybe just as badly remembered, but my thought at the time was that if no one is getting paid, how do get low level crew members to sign on? I’d much rather be an officer than scrubbing torpedo tubes.
"AI will take all of the jobs!" "People will still have to scrub the torpedo tubes!" How are these not mutually exclusive?