[1]: https://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/how-many-electric...
Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
41–50 of 783 posts
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#42I went to get new tires on my truck last month. 3 of the 5 bays at the tire shop had teslas getting new shoes. I asked the shop owner and he said EVs eat tires. Like 9-12 months max lifespan, great for business. I couldn't believe it but I've always heard there's exponential wear on tires relative to weight.
Our bz4x has 16,000 miles and the tires are like new. And it’s 400 pounds heavier than a Model 3.
Interested in the FUD level going on.
As an owner of a (2014 model) Nissan Leaf, which my wife and I both love, it does seem that Nissan somehow dropped the ball on electric given how good the Leaf still is (11 years later) as a suburban commuter vehicle and how it was a very early electric production car.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#43An an EV owner, I can testify that the tyre wear more than makes up for the reduction in brake dust. I’ve had to change tyres every 10K miles.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#44We should obviously ban combustion engine cars, at least starting with cities. I can’t think of a single clearer win for air quality.
I would love to have gone electric (bought a car in September) but I rent and don't have any way to charge at my residence. How do we solve the renters-that-cant-charge-their-cars problem?
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#45We should obviously ban combustion engine cars, at least starting with cities. I can’t think of a single clearer win for air quality.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#46We should obviously ban combustion engine cars, at least starting with cities. I can’t think of a single clearer win for air quality.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#47I went to get new tires on my truck last month. 3 of the 5 bays at the tire shop had teslas getting new shoes. I asked the shop owner and he said EVs eat tires. Like 9-12 months max lifespan, great for business. I couldn't believe it but I've always heard there's exponential wear on tires relative to weight.
This doesn't make sense. A Tesla weighs about as much as an SUV. We don't hear about SUVs eating tires. If Teslas specifically are in the tire shop more, perhaps it's that Teslas ship with shitty tires. I've heard of a number of car makes that ship with really fragile OEM tires as a way to get you back into the shop for service.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#48We should obviously ban combustion engine cars, at least starting with cities. I can’t think of a single clearer win for air quality.
I would love to have gone electric (bought a car in September) but I rent and don't have any way to charge at my residence. How do we solve the renters-that-cant-charge-their-cars problem?
They can't make it into their garages on the narrow road, and there are no curb side plugs in the front (NEC safety rules.) Funny until the Garbage truck rage mashes the horn at 6am... lol =3
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#49An an EV owner, I can testify that the tyre wear more than makes up for the reduction in brake dust. I’ve had to change tyres every 10K miles.
What are you doing to your tires that they only last 10k miles? I think that might be a driver error issue, because my EV (a heavier sedan) basically never needed tire replacement barring me running over a screw or something.
Re: Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars
#50We should obviously ban combustion engine cars, at least starting with cities. I can’t think of a single clearer win for air quality.
I would love to have gone electric (bought a car in September) but I rent and don't have any way to charge at my residence. How do we solve the renters-that-cant-charge-their-cars problem?
Plus, most people can charge at home with an extension cord. It's not particularly fast, but you should be able to get 4-5 miles an hour. In the worst case scenario where you can only charge at home and can only charge for 10 hours overnight, that's still 40 miles of driving which is enough for a lot of commuters. Even if it falls short—again—you can use public chargers.
Lastly, eliminating the sale of ICE cars will be a pretty rapid forcing function on the deployment of EV chargers. Still, I'd be all for locations that ban combustion engines mandating that landlords provide EV charging facilities.