Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I disagree that being less precise is a flaw. > Biological evolution shows us how far you can get with "good enough". That are valid points when speaking about human-human interactions where we can allow ourselves for much more freedom in forming thoughts. But still, written text never will be as expressive as face to face communication when you can hear, see and feel emotions. So even for humans, a raw text is not…
> Natural language is not sufficient to give precise instructions On consideration, this is the core of our disagreement and it is probably one that we will not see past. I have to assume that you see human/computer interactions as master-slave relations. You are the master providing instructions and the computer is a slave that MUST do precisely what you instruct it to do. I would wager that you feel frustrated when…
Surely you mean "controller-agent"? Bzzzt, natural language check failed :-)