Live data from Hacker News

Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

community.clearlinux.org

101–110 of 121 posts

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#101
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Intel will probably be somebody’s subsidiary for less than $150B sometime within the next 3 years, pending DOJ approval. Company is absolutely cooked.

$150B is pretty cheap if it comes with ready-to-go chip fabs.

You have to remember it comes with a phenomenal debt load.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#102
> Effective immediately, Intel will no longer provide security patches, updates, or maintenance for Clear Linux OS

If you've ever wondered how to lose all trust from your user base, it's the words effective immediately.

People need time to move and this basically gives users until the first vulnerability. Thanks Intel.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#103
post #40
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Always bet against Intel whenever it's something software?

Intel will probably be somebody’s subsidiary for less than $150B sometime within the next 3 years, pending DOJ approval. Company is absolutely cooked.

There's enough value still there...

If you spit up chip design and fab, who would be interested in each? And is there enough x86 demand to keep the design side open? Windows on ARM is a thing, and data centers have been buying more from AMD than they used to.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#104
I'm in the market for a new desktop PC. Historically, Intel has been better, or at least more likely to have Linux support. Performance-wise, it's comparable enough for productivity use and maybe more power efficient, but the company is losing money, shipping bugs that can damage hardware, and disinvesting in software. I'm late to the party, but I feel like I have to go AMD.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#105
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not that difficult. Choose boring over trendy. Simple over complex. Stability and quality over speed and quantity. There is a lot of software that fits and optimizes for the former. Just be smart and selective about your choices, and avoid compromising.

It's not that simple actually -- this kind of thinking might leave you working on mainframes in 2000 (or even now) which is obviously a mistake. It requires a certain taste. There's a skill involved. > Just be smart and selective about your choices, and avoid compromising. This is a very "draw the rest of the owl" kind of statement

Well, sure, but those weren't instructions. Just general guidelines to counter the claim that choosing safe technology requires superpowers. It is much simpler than that.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#106

For background: This was Intel's distro and it's likely that most/all of the folks that were maintaining it are a part of the 5,000 layoffs just announced, bringing the total Intel layoffs to 20,000 people.

[flagged]

How do you flag low quality comments in HN?

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#107
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

no, the message poster keeps his job, so expect more messages

Round after round of layoffs is terrible for morale and drives away existing good talent. Layoffs should cut deep... once. Corporations these days are rehashing the unwise, bureaucratic stupidity of decades past.

They don’t want to retain good (costly) talent. They want to shed the costly talent and acquire cheap talent.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#108
post #47
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much notice did ppl get when sacked?

From my experience, none. "Utterly unfortunately, today was your last day with the company. A separation agreement has been sent to your personal email. Your corporate access is being revoked. Thank you for your contribution!" Being fired for poor performance is all about ample warnings, issuing a PIP, etc. The company wants the employee back on track. Being laid off is a situation that an employee cannot fix with th…

PIP is not “wants the employee back on track”. It’s “documentation of a performance problem and good faith attempt at remedy to justify firing”.

Re: Shutting Down Clear Linux OS

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lindy_effect "a theorized phenomenon by which the future life expectancy of some non-perishable things, like a technology or an idea, is proportional to their current age."

Sure, but the counter is that you're going to be very late to some new foundational tech (ex. Kubernetes) that are legitimately useful. There are benefits to being early to a trend that has legs

There’s nothing wrong with getting involved in things that seem like they might be interesting without counting on their long-term survival. Hype-chasing on the other hand tends to be a bad plan.
Post reply on HN