Live data from Hacker News

What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

derekthompson.org

311–320 of 927 posts

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#311
post #6

What will it take to have a stable society that doesn't depend on indefinite economic/population growth?

I don't think that is possible so long as inflation occurs. When money is worth less, items costs more which means more economic growth is necessary (increased salaries, expenses, etc). Maybe I am missing something though?

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#312
I find the repeated comments of how much parenting 'sucks' and how much childbearing 'sucks' to be distasteful.

It has been the single most incredible experience I've had (5 times over).

I feel like, primarily, the reason why our society isn't having children is because of a growing selfishness and entitlement; which happens to be the very thing that Rome was suffering from when their society was collapsing too.

No, I'm not rich and I'm not old. But I was brought up in a family that cherished loved ones and family. Love was agape, not eros.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#313
post #161

My $0.02 is being a mom sucks. In modern relationships, men just want to work and come home to a cooked meal and clean house, but their wives are working just as many hours the men are. Having kids means tension in relationship, unpaid labor by the woman, and stress parenting kids. Even if the husband steps up, he still can't breast feed for 3 hours per day. Pregnancy is really terrible on the woman's body. Post-part…

Not convinced that this is down to women. In my personal experience women want to have kids wayyyy more than men it is the men who are refusing them or want to delay. In fact I would say this is basically everyone I know, the men are the ones being anti-natal while women want kids way earlier.

> In fact I would say this is basically everyone I know, the men are the ones being anti-natal while women want kids way earlier.

This does not make sense. It's not men taking birth-control pills, plan-b and having abortions.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#314
post #161

My $0.02 is being a mom sucks. In modern relationships, men just want to work and come home to a cooked meal and clean house, but their wives are working just as many hours the men are. Having kids means tension in relationship, unpaid labor by the woman, and stress parenting kids. Even if the husband steps up, he still can't breast feed for 3 hours per day. Pregnancy is really terrible on the woman's body. Post-part…

your experience sucks. I'm a 50 yr old man with two teenagers and a wife, I'm the major bread winner, but we both work 5 days a week. I do most the shopping and cooking.

being a mum doesn't have to suck. choices are being weighed and made.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#315
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A stable population requires a fertility rate of about 2.1. It’s not about growth, it’s about stability of population at this point.

There's over 8 billion people, the population is exceptionally stable my friend.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You can also hire a nanny. Yes, or just have your servants watch them. Most families in the US can't afford a nanny. Daycare is already stretching it. > It's also not the end of the world to take a couple years off work. It's a hurdle, but not the end of the road. Many people do it. Mostly women, and that helps keep the gender pay gap going.

> Most families in the US can't afford a nanny. Daycare is already stretching it. Where are you at? Nannies are cheaper than daycare starting at 1 kid and the cost becomes overwhelming in favor of a nanny when there's multiple kids. You can also have the nanny watch other kids in the neighborhood if you only have 1 kid.

>Where are you at?

There are two ways to hire a nanny. The "law abiding as a point of pride" way is comically expensive.

The "pay your neighbor's teenager cash" way is cheap.

If even that's too expensive for you then send your kids to whatever unlicensed, uninsured, unregulated daycare that some tradesman's wife runs out of her house.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In modern relationships, men just want to work and come home to a cooked meal and clean house As a man in a "modern relationship" I strenuously object to this. I mean yeah I want that (who wouldn't?), but I know I'm not going to get it because my partner has a job too so we have to help each other. Literally every one of my married male friends also regularly cooks and cleans.

Many men advocate for an equitable household. But the stats are clear. Women still perform substantially more labor at home than men do across the US population.

The stats are rigged and biased by not counting the types of work men do, and if they did count it they wouldn’t reach the “right” conclusions so wouldn’t be published.

This is written about quite a bit.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We certainly can't have a stable society with a rapidly shrinking population.

Isn't that the main promise of AI and automation and whatnot?

We are promised flying cars since the 50s as well.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#319
post #298
post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> was an anomaly Unfortunately suspect this is the right answer.

Nope! Check out the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future's 1970 Congressional Report: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED050960.pdf#page=10 (copy and paste URL to avoid HTTP Referer check) John D. Rockefeller Ⅲ sez: "We have all heard[citation needed] about a population problem in the developing nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, where death rates have dropped rapidly and populations hav…

You're talking about the widely known concept called the "demographic transition" and it has slowed, not accelerated, the death of the single-income household in the West because it's more affordable to support smaller families and to start families later in life.

Re: What caused the 'baby boom'? What would it take to have another?

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In modern relationships, men just want to work and come home to a cooked meal and clean house As a man in a "modern relationship" I strenuously object to this. I mean yeah I want that (who wouldn't?), but I know I'm not going to get it because my partner has a job too so we have to help each other. Literally every one of my married male friends also regularly cooks and cleans.

They are married though. A bunch a guys stand no chance of being or staying married because they just don’t offer what it takes

[flagged]
Post reply on HN