Live data from Hacker News

Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success

blog.tjll.net

1–10 of 114 posts

Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success

#6

There are numerous distributions not using systemd. So adding “complete, utter, unmitigated “ in front of success seems far-fetched.

The whole post does have a somewhat hyperbolic tone to it. Personally, I agree with the content and analysis, but I could see the language could feel a bit off-putting, especially given the past flame wars over systemd

Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success

#7

There are numerous distributions not using systemd. So adding “complete, utter, unmitigated “ in front of success seems far-fetched.

The whole post does have a somewhat hyperbolic tone to it. Personally, I agree with the content and analysis, but I could see the language could feel a bit off-putting, especially given the past flame wars over systemd

It's a lighthearted post, so probably not worth tone policing.

Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success

#8

I remember when I first upgraded a system to a version using it. This was probably a RHEL 6 -> 7 update back in 2014 or so. It made so many common things I had to do so as a sysadmin super straightforward.

Same, that was my first experience as well. It was a breath of fresh air in many ways, and after my initial learning of the new syntax, I quickly became a convert.

That said, I have had some concerns over the years about the growing scope of systemd. I think history has shown my concerns were overblown, though I think it is definitely possible and even likely that people were affected by those arguments and maybe moderated the ambitions a little bit. That could be for better or worse, I don't know, but I do think it was a factor

Post reply on HN