Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
1–10 of 114 posts
Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#2Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#3It made so many common things I had to do so as a sysadmin super straightforward.
Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#4Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#5Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#6There are numerous distributions not using systemd. So adding “complete, utter, unmitigated “ in front of success seems far-fetched.
Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#7There are numerous distributions not using systemd. So adding “complete, utter, unmitigated “ in front of success seems far-fetched.
The whole post does have a somewhat hyperbolic tone to it. Personally, I agree with the content and analysis, but I could see the language could feel a bit off-putting, especially given the past flame wars over systemd
Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#8I remember when I first upgraded a system to a version using it. This was probably a RHEL 6 -> 7 update back in 2014 or so. It made so many common things I had to do so as a sysadmin super straightforward.
That said, I have had some concerns over the years about the growing scope of systemd. I think history has shown my concerns were overblown, though I think it is definitely possible and even likely that people were affected by those arguments and maybe moderated the ambitions a little bit. That could be for better or worse, I don't know, but I do think it was a factor
Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#9Re: Systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success
#10So, systemd change is a pain for me.