Live data from Hacker News

Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

dublinlive.ie

191–200 of 586 posts

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#192
post #4

A teacher in school told me about the time they visited East Germany. Armed guards poked though his luggage. It's a slippery slope toward fascism.

East Germany was under communist control after the fascist regime lost the war... It's accurate to describe as "authoritarian", but not "fascist."

Of course it lacked the mark on the anticommunism checkbox, but control of society and control of economy were checked. That's 50% of the fascist playbook.

There was probably some nationalism too. Stalin buried internatonalism quickly. They would inevitably bow to the Russian overlords. No shame about it. We were bowing to the USA in the West and we still are.

Anyway, was communism only a facade by the 70s and the 80s? In that case it was a fully fascist country. All of the East.

I'd like to hear from somebody who lived in those countries at that time.

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#193
All the bickering about the validity of this specific story and the “if you don’t like it don’t ever leave home to go anywhere ever” misses the crux of the issue that these articles are trying to raise:

* Do we agree that a law enforcement arm of any country should be allowed to perform warrantless searches of electronic devices?

* Do we find it acceptable that persons with critical views are denied entry to countries that profess protection of speech for its citizens?

* If we find either of the above objectionable, what should we be doing to stop it?

The reality is that this is on the rise, not just in the USA but globally, and we should be having frank discussions on whether this is acceptable or not given its repercussions.

For context, despite my critique of an unnamed EMEA government, they’ve happily let me into their country repeatedly to do work for an employer, associate with my colleagues, and perform volunteer work within its borders. On the flip side, I have serious doubts about my ability to enter authoritarian regimes like China because of my outspoken critique of government policies, regardless of my intentions within their borders.

This [broader issue] is what we should be discussing, not nuanced specifics over a single incident.

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#194
post #8

Wonder what the "political correctness is bad" "nobody is allowed to crack jokes anymore" "cancel culture is out of control" crowd will say about this one...

A little while ago Scott Alexander did a lengthy post about how Curtis Yarvin, aka Moldbug, has essentially backtracked on everything he ever said about tyranny and these days gleefully cheers on all the things he decried in his early writing. Yarvin's response was, essentially, "You actually believed that I believed that stuff? lmao, idiot. This was about power and now we have it, piss off." Yarvin is unusually cand…

Maybe this? https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/moldbug-sold-out

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#195

A teacher in school told me about the time they visited East Germany. Armed guards poked though his luggage. It's a slippery slope toward fascism.

Interestingly, as an American, literally the only time I've had my luggage poked through by an armed guard was in a social democracy in Europe.

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#196

> "placed in a cell" I think the title is deficient and should be based on this higher-weighted fact, over the weaker phrasing "refused entry". "Tourist jailed without trial for possessing political cartoon"

The higher-weighted fact is that the USA has a brutal double assassination of opposition politicians (a senator and a house representative along with their spouses), and no one is talking about that, zero mentions on hacker news. A guy detained for a Vance meme? Yeah, keep your attention on that. You live in a fascism already.

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#197
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on decades of experience with my family: it's only political correctness when other people do it. When they do it, it's just common decency, common sense, family values, etc. And as far as the original story, individual border agents should absolutely not be doing this to people because they have a meme on their phone, doubly so one where Vance shared a version of it himself. There is straight up no justificati…

> doubly so one where Vance shared a version of it himself No. Should have precisely zero baring on anything at all. Reminder: Support of free speech requires support of the right to say things that you loathe by people you hate or you don’t support free speech.

> Reminder: Support of free speech requires support of the right to say things that you loathe by people you hate or you don’t support free speech.

No it doesn't. You're putting arbitrary limits to suit your views. You can support free speech for American citizens and also support using a foreigner's speech to determine whether or not we allow them into the country. That's just smart border policy. We should be vetting who we allow into our country, and using their speech is one way to vet them.

Obviously not allowing someone in over a bald JD Vance meme is stupid. But the idea that we have to allow all foreigners the same level of free speech without it affecting their chances of getting into the country is also stupid.

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#198
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

US visa applicants are required to disclose five years of social media history and to make listed accounts public. https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/20...

>disclose five years of social media history Where does it say that? Your source only says profiles need to be public Moreover your description is slightly misleading because it only applies to "all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas", which notably excludes tourism visas (B-2). The visas listed all seem to be academic related, presumably because the administration wants to crack down on woke ivy league st…

It was on HN yesterday,

> "THE US EMBASSY in Dublin is tightening its visa requirements, saying that future applicants looking to visit the country will be required to divulge “all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last five years” on their visa application form."

https://www.thejournal.ie/us-visa-changes-6740830-Jun2025/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44354298 (209 comments)

Re: Man 'refused entry into US' as border control catch him with bald JD Vance meme

#199
post #57

Going to the USA as a tourist might be the most stupid action that one can make at this time. Unless you have a dying mother or father, there is absolutely no reason to visit this country. It reminds me of the tourists that used to go to North Korea for fun some years ago, it never was a good idea.

In 2023, when tourism rates had yet to fully recover from Covid, over 66 million people visited the US from abroad. I don't have more recent statistics, but I'm going to assume that the number is the same or higher this year. Out of that population which could fill a decent-sized country, how many people have been treated so unfairly as the one in this article? How do those stats compare with other countries, and the…

We used to take two annual trips to the US, and cross the border every 4-6 weeks to shop, eat, and fill up our gas on the way home.

We haven't been there since this current administration took over, and have no plans on it until something changes.

Trumps comments regarding Canada, and the whole "51st state" rhetoric triggered the decision, but these stories absolutely play a part in it. I'm not about to put myself, or my family, in a position where someone might be detained for anywhere from days to weeks for no reason.

There's a big, beautiful world out there, and plenty of countries who are happy to have us and take our tourist dollars, all without me having to worry about getting detained for silly pictures on my phone. It's a pretty easy decision if you ask me.

Post reply on HN