Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Again, this is a fallacy. Okay, maybe you are not a native speaker, so you might mean a different thing with fallacy. Here's the dictionary definition of fallacy > an idea that a lot of people think is true but is in fact false [0] > a false belief [0] My comment was > Again, no one is locking down GrapheneOS you can literally download the source and try to get it to run on any device you like. You just want someon…
[flagged]
---
> 1. Why should the GrapheneOS Developers do the work you want them to do? They seem uninterested and I don't see you paying them the 100s of thousands of dollars to hire someone to do the work for them.
They dont do any work regarding security that would matter. As hardly anyone is using GrapheneOS. Most people use it for privacy, I don't know a one single person that would use it for security, I have bootloader unlocked as I don't care, its not something that would be a reasonable threat to me, while government actors are not something, I can defend against as they will break my legs and I will beg them to allow me to enter pin.
> 2. Name a Phone that's not made by a corporation.
So they can immediately stop doing it. It is futile, insecure and worthless even from perspective of privacy unless they give people a chance to use it. And currently they dont with excuse of security.
---
Something about gay fish.