Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, manned exploration does sound pretty cool though.
Sounds like a good summary of the Trump administration -- fund the high profile, low bang for buck projects and cut the boring high bang for buck projects.
Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
331–340 of 420 posts
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#332> The New Horizons spacecraft [...] reached Pluto in 2016 and is currently exploring other distant features of the system [...]. Keeping it running today by receiving its transmitted data and making sure it remains on course costs about $14.7 million a year, or less than 2% of its total price tag.
Does anyone know why this would be so expensive? A slice of Deep Space Network time must be expensive but it still sounds like an outrageous figure to me.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
Public research is just government subsidies to corporations, which acquire IP for pennies on the dollar for their own profits while leaving taxpayers with the chaff. It’s a net loss for the public good who has to pay twice.
There is a very long and expensive path from basic research IP to a profitable drug. Private pharma companies already bear the risk of the drug development pipeline, which has a very low probability of success and takes many years. Adding fundamental research to that pipeline would make these companies a riskier investment.
The OP asked for an answer, and the fallacy I’m trying to point out is this assumption that “all” research is generally worthwhile. And I don’t mean just that there are exceptions, but swaths of topics and institutions and researchers and methods that aren’t really adding anything of value. Some areas, like aerospace, have been the focus of intense research for a long long time. This is to the point where SpaceX has been able to walk in and build a space program from scratch. I don’t mean to minimize their hard work, but it just shows that we’re not in the 1930s anymore. It makes sense that you should occasionally adjust your priorities from time to time based on your needs.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
Old. They're old. Gerontocracy means old people. Dems, republicans, both are old. The average age for republicans and democrats in the house is 57 or so. The average in the senate is 62(r) and 65(d). While 57 isn't ancient, it's also not young enough to give a shit about 2070. 62 and 65 year olds certainly don't care about a date so far in the future that their kids will be dead.
[flagged]
I'm saying they're all old. Their incentives are wildly different than mine because they're older than I am.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/24/nx-s1-5087892/nasa-starliner-...
So private contractors are unreliable for a variety of reasons? We should get all of this private bloat out of the government.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry how is SpaceX unreliable? I personally think we need at least a second reliable launch provider, probably rocket lab, just for redundancy.
https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/elon-musk-threatened-decom...
Idk, call me crazy but I saw that post and never believed it would actually happen. Call me when something of that magnitude does.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#337Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry how is SpaceX unreliable? I personally think we need at least a second reliable launch provider, probably rocket lab, just for redundancy.
Because of Musk's mood swings.
No tweets as sources.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#338Well, yes, that's the point. Authoritarians want to consolidate power and loot wealth, not improve things or make the world a better place.
Americans want looting and authoritarianism, so that’s what they’re getting. There’s no excuses here after a majority of people voted for Trump’s return, with his repeated promises that he wouldn’t be held back this time around. We got exactly what we voted for — worldwide tariffs, sending the military to round up migrants, a military parade with tanks in DC, antivax boards — all of these things he talked about befor…
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#339Earlier quoted context omitted.
NASA still makes these competitive contracts though and picks among several contractors. Afterwards NASA is still involved in design through reviews and other lines of communication. Using your analogy, if I do hire a contractor I'll talk with them a lot about what they're going to do and make sure it's generally in line with what I want, but they're generating most of the ideas and just incorporating what I say.
Eh, not so much. They have reviews, but it is a much more hands off approach. * There were instances where NASA engineers brought up issues with designs and were told it wasn’t their role to drive the design. The concept of CCP was they were buying a ride, not a rocket. Just like you don’t tell Airbus what engine they should use when you buy a plane ticket. * IMO the goal of CCP was to find a mechanism to informally…
Again, you don't want two different organizations trying to design one thing.
Re: Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are the symptoms of this "unprecedented crisis" and what makes it a crisis?
Chicago spent $300 Million on freebies for migrants.[0] The mayor of NYC saying that the migrant crisis "will destroy New York City".[1] 1/3 of polled schools said that the influx of ESL migrant children had had a "significant" impact on their school districts, taking resources and attention away from American schoolkids.[2] 77% of Americans considered the border situation to be either a "Crisis" or a "Major Problem"…
Here I was expecting data about how all these illegal immigrants are causing crimes everywhere at higher rates than americans, or how many cats and dogs they've eaten but I guess there's no actual evidence of a crisis.