Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well you're missing out and stunting your own worldview if you stick to only one source of information (regardless of which it is).
What do you read? I’m an economist reader too for weekly news. Would love other sources, but it’s hard to find anything with similar depth and a similar lack of sensational-ization found in most news. Edit: Oh, and global reach. The economist covers earth in almost equal detail for every region. Not quite equal of course, but darn close compared to most outlets.
Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
411–420 of 633 posts
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#412Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, they’re not. Of the 20 largest airports in the US, all but one of them have homes and offices surrounding them. The one that doesn’t is Denver, that’s mostly only because Denver’s airport is relatively new and the development hasn’t reached it yet.
that's actually not true and it's very easy to disprove because SFO is in the top 20 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_i... . I'm sure this is an airport most of the people on this site are familiar with but just in case you aren't, it's on reclaimed land in the San Francisco bay.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#413one dude sitting in 11A jumped out & survived pretty much unharmed. This was the Emergency Exit. https://x.com/indiatoday/status/1933160181871099943?s=46
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#414Gentle tip from a lifelong aviation enthusiast: wait one week before reading on causation. Exposing yourself to first-week speculation isn’t just unproductive, it’s often counterproductive since the actual findings can rhyme with the false speculation closely enough that you wind up muddling the two in your mind.
A week isn't long enough. Just wait for the official report.
I'm reminded of the crane collapse in Seattle that had pictures afterward and the pins were no longer in it. The expert analysis I had seen discussing it had said the pins don't just come out in a crane collapse, and where the join the sections the crane would be at its strongest. He was, of course, lit up by those with possible agendas saying "you can't speculate". He was right in the end.
So with the crane collapse it was interesting to see it all play out, but it's a matter of keeping perspective. There were literal pictures of the pins not being in place. Explanation that those pins should not be removed until later in the disassembly of the crane. Then there was the other "side" hurling accusations at him. Finally the official report.
Keeping perspective to me is that yes, I want to know what caused it. But I'm also interested along the way that some people/companies/govts seem to have a vested interest in shaping the story. So I don't run with any of it, but I try to remember who said what, even though nobody ever seems to be responsible for being batshit crazy.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#415Earlier quoted context omitted.
You ain’t walking away from a fully fueled aircraft crashing unfortunately…
This guy did: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3v6drp96zo
he must've been thrown out at just the right angle to not hit too much along the way...
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think he's implying that countries near the equator are underdeveloped and thus the crash could have been caused by human factors (such as negligence)
As opposed to the predictable accidents of the Amazon and Guyanan basins? Apart from the casual racism of lumping together areas of three continents in your generalisation, it was lazy racism as at 23 degrees North, Ahmedabad is close in latitude to Florida and far outside the 5-10 degree equitorial zone.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#417Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pro tip from an absolute rando: don’t bother with any source of breaking news. Read a weekly paper that summarises the important stuff. If something is truly pressing, you’ll hear about it from friends or coworkers.
Suggestions for some sources to read? I know the Economist, anything else others would recommend?
Between the Economist and WSJ, I get a good overview of opinions and facts.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seat 11A. That's interesting, typically most survivors are located in the back, this one was in the front-center.
11A was next to the emergency exit. There was a comment on Reddit suggesting he actually bailed just before impact.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#419Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well you're missing out and stunting your own worldview if you stick to only one source of information (regardless of which it is).
What do you read? I’m an economist reader too for weekly news. Would love other sources, but it’s hard to find anything with similar depth and a similar lack of sensational-ization found in most news. Edit: Oh, and global reach. The economist covers earth in almost equal detail for every region. Not quite equal of course, but darn close compared to most outlets.
Re: Air India flight to London crashes in Ahmedabad with more than 240 onboard
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pro tip from an absolute rando: don’t bother with any source of breaking news. Read a weekly paper that summarises the important stuff. If something is truly pressing, you’ll hear about it from friends or coworkers.
Suggestions for some sources to read? I know the Economist, anything else others would recommend?