Destabilization (e.g., military wars, trade wars, immigration wars, etc.) favors the strongest / wealthiest. Such chaos favors the status quo. The USA has no interest in peace in the Middle East.
The US just established the Abraham accords, with a large amount of majority Arab countries recognising Israel right before Hamas attacked. There’s a theory the attacks had a larger political goal which was to stop this widespread support for Jews living in their homeland.
US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
51–60 of 69 posts
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, I misspoke in my posting. I was gonna say zones which exclude Palestinians, i.e. the city is now segregated as a result of the Israeli occupation and illegal annexation of the city. The segregation of 1948 was a direct result of Israels unilateral declaration of independence. So I think we can say that the city was unsegregated from the fourth century, throughout the Arab and the Ottoman conquest, all the way…
Israeli Arabs and Druze are allowed into Jerusalem. It’s just not people from a specific territory with the history of causing violence towards Israelis.
Ramat Eshkol was established as a Jewish neighborhood soon after the 1967 occupation. It is one of 9 inner settlements in East Jerusalem where Palestinians are not allowed.
These “just not people from a specific territory” are Palestinians who are Christian or Muslim, because of their ethnicity, regardless of criminal history. This is segregation.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, I misspoke in my posting. I was gonna say zones which exclude Palestinians, i.e. the city is now segregated as a result of the Israeli occupation and illegal annexation of the city. The segregation of 1948 was a direct result of Israels unilateral declaration of independence. So I think we can say that the city was unsegregated from the fourth century, throughout the Arab and the Ottoman conquest, all the way…
Segregation of city in 1948 was direct result of Jordanian aggression, occupation, ethnic cleansing and annexation of east Jerusalem and west bank. But in 1967 Israel put an end to segregation of Jerusalem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_Settlements%2C_East_Jerus...
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#54I honestly do not think a geographically separated Palestinian state would work exactly for the same reasons it did not work out for east Pakistan, which is now Bangladesh. Clearly one of two things will ultimately occur: 1. A right wing Israeli government will eject non-citizen Arabs from the land either by settlement, starvation, or ejection. Then Israel will annex that land. This can only occur because everyone el…
Does that sort of thing even work against nuclear powers? You could certainly isolate them like North Korea, but no country would be willing to invade for fear of seeing a mushroom cloud over their capital.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Israeli Arabs and Druze are allowed into Jerusalem. It’s just not people from a specific territory with the history of causing violence towards Israelis.
Not everywhere: Ramat Eshkol was established as a Jewish neighborhood soon after the 1967 occupation. It is one of 9 inner settlements in East Jerusalem where Palestinians are not allowed. These “just not people from a specific territory” are Palestinians who are Christian or Muslim, because of their ethnicity, regardless of criminal history. This is segregation.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Israeli Arabs and Druze are allowed into Jerusalem. It’s just not people from a specific territory with the history of causing violence towards Israelis.
Not everywhere: Ramat Eshkol was established as a Jewish neighborhood soon after the 1967 occupation. It is one of 9 inner settlements in East Jerusalem where Palestinians are not allowed. These “just not people from a specific territory” are Palestinians who are Christian or Muslim, because of their ethnicity, regardless of criminal history. This is segregation.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#57I honestly do not think a geographically separated Palestinian state would work exactly for the same reasons it did not work out for east Pakistan, which is now Bangladesh. Clearly one of two things will ultimately occur: 1. A right wing Israeli government will eject non-citizen Arabs from the land either by settlement, starvation, or ejection. Then Israel will annex that land. This can only occur because everyone el…
> This is easier than it sounds from a military perspective because Israel is small and simple to isolate. Does that sort of thing even work against nuclear powers? You could certainly isolate them like North Korea, but no country would be willing to invade for fear of seeing a mushroom cloud over their capital.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Segregation of city in 1948 was direct result of Jordanian aggression, occupation, ethnic cleansing and annexation of east Jerusalem and west bank. But in 1967 Israel put an end to segregation of Jerusalem.
What about Ramat Eshkol or any of the 9 inner settlements in East Jerusalem? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_Settlements%2C_East_Jerus...
on the other side, in "palestinian state" for selling real estate to Israeli there is a death sentence.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#59I honestly do not think a geographically separated Palestinian state would work exactly for the same reasons it did not work out for east Pakistan, which is now Bangladesh. Clearly one of two things will ultimately occur: 1. A right wing Israeli government will eject non-citizen Arabs from the land either by settlement, starvation, or ejection. Then Israel will annex that land. This can only occur because everyone el…
But there are also Jewish settlements on the West Bank land, so it's not exactly the contiguous territory that it might be. Two-state solutions usually require either removing those settlements or putting them under Palestinian control, and the current Israeli government is extremely reluctant to accept either of those outcomes.
One could imagine a future government that is more amenable to that. That would still leave a disconnected Gaza, but it might just tamp down some of the hostilities.
Re: US ambassador to Israel:US no longer pursuing goal independent Palestinian state
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about Ramat Eshkol or any of the 9 inner settlements in East Jerusalem? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_Settlements%2C_East_Jerus...
what about it ? if somebody wants to rent/sell and their offer is accepted, they can move in. on the other side, in "palestinian state" for selling real estate to Israeli there is a death sentence.
Saying this about Palestinians is also very racist, participatory since there are people on this very thread flat out denying the existence of Palestinians (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44259547).