I made some GGUFs for those interested in running them at https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL or ./llama.cpp/llama-cli -hf unsloth/Magistral-Small-2506-GGUF:UD-Q4_K_XL --jinja --temp 0.7 --top-k -1 --top-p 0.95 -ngl 99 Please use --jinja for llama.cpp and use temperature = 0.7, top-p 0.95! Also best to increase Ollama's context length…
Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
121–130 of 444 posts
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an occasional user of Mistral, I find their model to give generally excellent results and pretty quickly. I think a lot of teams are now overly focused on winning the benchmarks while producing worse real results.
If so we need to fix the benchmarks.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
And, perhaps most relevantly, the regulatory environment the people are working in. French people working in America are probably more productive than French people working in France (if for no other reason because they probably work more hours in America than France).
Are we sure more time butt in office equates to more productivity?
You can write your in-house CRUD app in your basement or your office and it doesn't matter.
The vast majority of HN crowd and general social/mainstream media don't make the difference between these two scenarios
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
As an occasional user of Mistral, I find their model to give generally excellent results and pretty quickly. I think a lot of teams are now overly focused on winning the benchmarks while producing worse real results.
If so we need to fix the benchmarks.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#125Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#126Is the number of em-dashes in this marketing copy indicative of the kind of output that the model produces? If so, might want to tone it down a bit.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the purposes of GP's comment, I think the nationalities of the people actually running the company and doing the work are more relevant than who has invested.
And, perhaps most relevantly, the regulatory environment the people are working in. French people working in America are probably more productive than French people working in France (if for no other reason because they probably work more hours in America than France).
Not sure that's even true. Mistral is known to be a really hard-working place
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#128The only mention of tools I could find is this: > it significantly improves project planning, backend architecture, frontend design, and data engineering through sequenced, multi-step actions involving external tools or API. I'm guessing this means it was trained with tool calling? And if so, does that mean it does tool calling within the thinking/reasoning, or within the main text? Seems unclear
Tool calling isn't enabled in the official Magistral Small GGUF (or the Ollama one) which is sad. Hope they (or someone else) fix that soon.
This would likely be a good model for the "plan" mode in various agentic tools (cline, aider, cursor/windsurf/void, etc). So you'd have a chat in plan mode, then use devstral to actually implement that plan.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
And, perhaps most relevantly, the regulatory environment the people are working in. French people working in America are probably more productive than French people working in France (if for no other reason because they probably work more hours in America than France).
Are we sure more time butt in office equates to more productivity?
Remote work and flattening communication down to what digital media (Slack, Zoom, etc) afford strangle the beneficial network effects.
Re: Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
The cookie banners are corps trying to circumvent the rights and protections. If they actually went by the spirit of the protections, the cookie banners wouldn't be needed. Your ire is misdirected.
Are you sure? The ePrivacy Directive requires a (GDPR-level) consent for just placing the cookie, unless it's strictly necessary for the provision of the “service”. The way EU regulators interpret this, even web analytics falls outside the necessity exception and therefore requires consent. So as long as the user doesn't and/or is not able to automatically signal consent (or non-consent) eg via general browser-level…