201–210 of 241 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. But that's why I said "if it's good for the job it's good for the job" If there's something that Grok *positively* does better than other LLMs, why wouldn't you want to use it, because, _boohoo_ Musk bad.
Because you won't know when it's going to peppering in Holocaust denials in the emails it composes for you.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting how you put "hamas apologists" and not pro-palestinians next to Zionists. How would you have felt if it was written "pro-palestinains and genocide-apologists"?
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What kind of test is that? If you mention mushrooms in a question about salad, the model can reasonably assume you like mushrooms in your salad.
Mushrooms do not go with strawberries or pineapples in the context of a salad. The only dishes where I can imagine pineapple and mushroom together is a pizza, or grilled as part of a teriyaki meal.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't though because its not a complex and nuanced issue whatsoever. It's no different than teaching the controversy about evolution or seeing both sides of the holocaust. It is part of a planned coup against our government. Furthermore if you push it then it stops responding and refuses to answer at all.
I see. You WANT a slanted LLM, just one that's slanted in your direction!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually the first versions of Grok had the same "left leaning" bias as other models since it turns out that bias is in the data that everyone is using to train on), so if Grok is now more right leaning it is because they have deliberately manipulated it to be so. This also begs the question, does it make sense to call something a "bias" when that is the majority view (i.e. reflected in bulk of training data) ?
Does it make sense to call something “the majority view” when most news websites shut down their comment sections a decade ago so that you can’t see what other readers really think?
Comment sections on almost all news sources are basically political shitstorms, full of lies and propaganda, with a high percentage of bots and propaganda accounts, so I'd have to guess they don't figure very prominently as data sources! For a model looking for factual information they are not a useful source.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see. You WANT a slanted LLM, just one that's slanted in your direction!
It is not slanted for it to report reality. Also its a dead give away its being tweaked when it stops responding. It's the same if you touched on another forbidden topic.
Anyway, all RLFHed models are "tweaked". Perhaps Grok leans a bit more "right" than ChatGPT or Claude (though I haven't noticed that), but it's not radically different.
Here's ChatGPT's answer to the original question:
https://chatgpt.com/share/682cac41-485c-8003-9e35-d37123b2a5...
It is similar to Grok's.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because you won't know when it's going to peppering in Holocaust denials in the emails it composes for you.
If you found out that there's a task Grok excels at far better than GPT or Gemini, you're telling me you wouldn't use it?
Can anyone provide a reason an enterprise would choose Grok over a similar class of models?