Earlier quoted context omitted.
Francis had a degree in chemistry if I'm not mistaken.
It's a modern rhetorical fallacy that science is directly antithetical to religion, when many of history's greatest scientists were themselves "spiritual" in some way (though that degree of spirituality may have ranged from near-atheistic scientific pantheism a la Einstein and Sagan, to members of the clergy). I am glad there are still numerous counterexamples of those with firm educations in hard STEM fields that st…
First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
381–390 of 1001 posts
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#382Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#383The prevailing wisdom has been proven wrong on this occasion. He is very much a continuation of Francis's school of thought in spite of the "fat Pope thin Pope" wisdom, and he is an American who has been elected Pope, which was almost unthinkable because of America's economic, political, and mass media domination of the western world. Very unexpected
[flagged]
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#384Earlier quoted context omitted.
It kinda has a shitty reputation right now, especially in Europe. This will embolden the clown in Chief and that isn't good for anyone.
It's possible. My take is that a Pope who's relatably "like them" will be more effective at reminding U.S. Catholics that they may need to choose between their faith and Trumpist idolatry.
I mean... they clearly already have. If Trump supporting Catholics haven't changed their mind by now I don't think an American Pope is going to convince them. And unless we're assuming a third Trump term I don't see what the point would be. The damage has been done.
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#385Prior to Francis, the last pope we had from a religious order (as opposed to a career diocesan) was Gregory XVI in 1831. Now we've had two religious popes in a row --- Francis, a Jesuit, and then Leo, an Augustinian.
Can you explain this like I'm 5?
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#386Earlier quoted context omitted.
> some of more conscientious people in the US are feeling a little awkward about the name these days. So it isn’t surprising that we’d be the ones objecting If the folks who got us into this mess with label obsession move on to something less charged like USian, that’s probably for the net good.
if the language police want to tell Americans what they're allowed to call themselves and expect any actual adoption they had better come up with a better word than "USian". How do you even pronounce that? Oosh-an? But also sure, telling Americans to rename things, that hasn't caused ANY backlash now resulting in the renaming of huge bodies of water to stupid things, keep up the cultural dictates, it's totally workin…
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#387Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are several important American bishops who have made serious strides to protect children. This is an ignorant statement.
It's not, really; the Catholic Church (among most other religious orders) routinely prioritises self-preservation over the safety of children. If we were to use "was in proximity to allegations of child abuse and didn't act on it" as a barometer for who was permitted to ascent to the papacy, we'd have a pretty small pool to choose from.
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#388Prior to Francis, the last pope we had from a religious order (as opposed to a career diocesan) was Gregory XVI in 1831. Now we've had two religious popes in a row --- Francis, a Jesuit, and then Leo, an Augustinian.
Can you explain this like I'm 5?
Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#389Re: First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo XIV
#390Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. You can find yourself in some very frustrating loops, down to the parsing of words back to the original languages they were translated from, when trying to argue the Bible as a sole foundation for literally everything. Source: grew up in churches that tried to do just that.
Memories of using Strong's reference to do this very thing.
For the (fortunately) uninitiated: