I'm curious whether the community will trust Redis-the-company again after this, or if they'll choose to stick with Valkey. The other concern is at least some big company legal departments are wary of AGPL software, which makes Valkey, still BSD, more attractive to them. Edit: Regardless, thank you and the rest of the folks inside Redis for pushing to bring this back to OSS!
Statistically nobody is using valkey.
Redis is open source again
101–110 of 815 posts
Re: Redis is open source again
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Statistically nobody is using valkey.
Are there usage stats available? How do you know this?
Re: Redis is open source again
#103Re: Redis is open source again
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
fool me can't get fooled again But in seriousness, the chances of valkey going closed source are low. It's run by Linux Foundation. It would be like suggesting that Node.js might go closed source...
They were obviously making a tongue in cheek comment instead of seriously suggesting Valkey may go proprietary.
Re: Redis is open source again
#105I'm curious whether the community will trust Redis-the-company again after this, or if they'll choose to stick with Valkey. The other concern is at least some big company legal departments are wary of AGPL software, which makes Valkey, still BSD, more attractive to them. Edit: Regardless, thank you and the rest of the folks inside Redis for pushing to bring this back to OSS!
Statistically nobody is using valkey.
This is Open Source working well.
Unfortunately, the reverse flow does not work.
Re: Redis is open source again
#106Re: Redis is open source again
#107I contributed a minor (but imho still neat :p) improvement to Redis under its original license, and personally moved to using redict when the unexpected license change to SSPL was announced - and I was feeling betrayed as a contributor to a properly-FOSS-codebase. (Had they switched to AGPL right away, I'd have been perfectly fine with that change from a moral perspective, ftr.) I have a great deal of respect for ant…
Microsoft made one called Garnet, I wouldn't say its a fork though, its basically compatible with Redis and implemented mostly in C#. It supports the RESP wire protocol from Redis for ease of compatibility. https://github.com/microsoft/garnet
Re: Redis is open source again
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft made one called Garnet, I wouldn't say its a fork though, its basically compatible with Redis and implemented mostly in C#. It supports the RESP wire protocol from Redis for ease of compatibility. https://github.com/microsoft/garnet
You do see how that's even worse, right?
https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/blob/main/LICENSE
It's MIT licensed?
Re: Redis is open source again
#109Re: Redis is open source again
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your company invested hundreds of engineering hours switching from Redis to a clean fork of Redis?
At the very least you have to validate everything that touches redis, which means finding everything that touches redis. Internal tools and docs need to be updated. And who knows if someone adopted post-fork features? If this is a production system that supports the core business, hundreds of hours seems pretty reasonable. For a small operation that can afford to YOLO it, sure, it should be pretty easy.
I wasn't aware the license had any negative affect on private internal use.