Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, we use Linux dev machines but IT has loaded them up with enough panopticon software that several times a week for an hour or so I can not get enough CPU or resident RAM to do productive work. But at least there are no forced system reboots at inconvenient times during the work day.
At a previous job they offered Linux laptops (yay!), but... - umask was not 022, so installing pretty much anything with `sudo make install` would fail, as would some software. - Running nmap caused an alert to phone home to IT, who would nag me on slack. - Opening well-known ports to my LAN (like 22) caused an alert to IT. - An "agent" program ran constantly, often using 100% of a CPU. The system overall had about 4…
Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
301–310 of 311 posts
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
I rather think the right word is clunky: one of the dev is attached to Server-Side Decoration/against CSD for some reason (none of his arguments make sense), so every stock app are difficult to read and taking unneeded screen space. It's just bad UX.
Are you suggesting that avoiding client-side window decorations in favor of the traditional server-side approach is bad UX?
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#303Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Evangelizing KDE is not something I care about This, sometimes it's enough for things to just work as you expect so you can do your actual work. I don't really understand why so many people are unpaid part time evangelizers.
Personally, I want projects I like to survive, and drawing attention to them is one way to attempt to contribute to that, for not-exclusively-but-primarily egoistic reasoning.
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not bloated, it just has lots of options. If you like someone else to decide everything for you: buy a Mac or use gnome. But KDE is not for you then. Don't try to make it into something it was never meant to be.
I use Cinnamon. Less bloat, more coherent, still plenty of options
But what things in KDE do you consider 'bloat'?
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#305Earlier quoted context omitted.
> People complain to me about various things, performance isn't one of them. which is fine, and you are doing the absolutely correct thing regarding fixing what's being complained about. But the complaints i keep hearing (and having myself) is that most apps are quite slow, and has been increasingly growing slower over time as updates arrives - mobile phones in particular.
I think this reflects a shift towards all software depending on a remote database, more than some change in programmer attitudes or bad software in general. Win 9x era software relied entirely on files for sharing, and there was no real notion of conflict resolution or collaboration beyond that. If you were lucky the program would hold a Windows file lock on a shared drive exported over a LAN using SMB and so anyone…
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
I checked in KDE, since I'm generally confused as to why it's not more popular now: in the wallpaper settings you choose `wallpaper type: plain color` and it gives you a color picker to set it. It also shows you the screen you set it for, and a boolean to set it for all screens at once.
I think it's historic reasons. KDE used to be the "bloated" desktop way back when (I know, pretty silly and laughable now given the current state of things). That cemented Gnome/Mate into a lot of major distros as the primary DME. Ubuntu being the most famous. The QT licensing situation is also a bit of a bizarre quagmire. There are certainly people that don't like KDE for more ideological reasons. Personally, none o…
There are a lot of people that bitch about it, but that is only because it is the most popular one and they think that Linux desktop is a zero sum game. They don't use Gnome most of the time and arguments tend to be parroting somebody else and probably out of date for years or just kinda made up conspiracy theories about Redhat or something.
The whole thing is pretty confused. Gnome being popular doesn't make KDE not be popular.
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#307Earlier quoted context omitted.
> KDE used to be the "bloated" desktop That’s not my recollection. I believe that the non-free license you mention was the major factor, in addition to the fact that KDE was written in C++ at a time when the free software community still preferred to write software primarily in C. GNOME was written using a free software toolkit, and it was written in C, and it was associated with the FSF.
I distinctly recall people criticizing C++ programs as "bloated" and slow compared to pure C programs.
Nowadays the major problem with KDE is that by the time it is stable a new QT major version gets released and along with that it essentially gets a major rewrite, which takes years to stabilize and once it does a new QT version is released, etc etc etc.
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
When I last reinstalled the apps on my phone, the one Google app that ironically I didn’t keep was Keep.
I really want a simple and easy to use shopping/TODO/checklist app that I can use with my family, from a vendor that has been around for a long time. Ideally free, but I'm fine with paying a small price for it. It should be available on Windows/Android/iOS. The problem is, I don't really trust most small vendors...
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And this is the so-called responsive design... I’m not sure if this was meant to be a pun, but “responsive design” has nothing to do with how quickly a UI loads. It’s about adapting to different screen sizes.
Plain html could do that too. People forget the ancient knowledge.
Re: Why did Windows 7 log on slower for months if you had a solid color background?
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just use hibernate instead. Marginally longer start up time and no more worries. For shorter periods I just leave it on (like when taking the laptop to a meeting room).
Hibernate is a lot harder to make work correctly, and can lead to problems in more niche cases, so it's not a guarantee